Hello!
A typo refers to when a person mistypes a word and ends up misspelling it.
An example of a typo may be "beautigul" instead of "beautiful." This is because the wrong key was typed when spelling the word.
I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!
- Mal
I believe the answer is D. chronological order.
I've just learned about this stuff in my English class.
Well I answer the question if you tell me what u think
Answer:
1. sister and I as subject and shopped as verb put u in the space before sentence.
2. chinese is the subject display and sell are the verbs
3. Beijing and Shanghai as subjects attract as a verb
4.Farmers as subject and buy and sell as verb
5. shop as subject and compare as verb
6. you and I as subject and buy as verb
7. Tamala as subject and wanted as verb
8. Eric and I as subject and looked and bought as verb
9. Some stores as subject and wrap and mail as verb
10. my uncle or I as subject and call and make as verb
Explanation:
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>