1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
8

Stokely Carmichael's approach to Civil Rights was to segregate black people from white people. Why did he believe this would hel

p African-Americans?
History
2 answers:
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Stokely Carmichael fought for the rights of black people in America. Initially, most black people never believed in themselves. They felt they were inferior when compared to the white people but Stokely stood out as an exception to fight for the black people. He believed that African Americans were strong people who should be given opportunity to exercise their strengths and values. He promoted black freedom in 1966. He wanted African Americans to accept whom they are without fear and work towards achieving their goals in life. He believed in the innate ability of blacks to pursue their goals and achieve great things in life.  He fought for their political freedom by encouraging them to work in unity and form political parties. He encouraged them to own their own businesses and be creative without being dependent on the white people.  He believed his approach to civil rights will help the African-American to achieve their goals independently

Virty [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Stokely Carmicheal movement was the promoter of  black power in 1966.  He advocates for self-determination for black people of African descent; African-Americans.

Explanation:

He believed that this will be of help to African-Americans to come together for common goal. He believes that by accepting whom they are and coming together to form political parties, own business and be equal participants in the 'American dream', they can be strong political force. African-Americans should own and run their business so the they will own wealth and help each other. He believed his approach will open the same opportunity the white race had to African-Americans too.

Though his approach run in conflict with the believes of the mainstream civil rights movements.

You might be interested in
How did literacy test laws affect politics in the south after civil war ?
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

I would say they allowed states to avoid enforcing the fifteenth amendment

Explanation:

The 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted African American men the right to vote by declaring that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." Although ratified on February 3, 1870, the promise of the 15th Amendment would not be fully realized for almost a century. Through the use of poll taxes, literacy tests and other means, Southern states were able to effectively disenfranchise African Americans. It would take the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 before the majority of African Americans in the South were registered to vote.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Although women served in the war and joined the workforce, they were not
azamat

Answer:

Well one piece of evidence is that they were not paid as much as men, that's for sure

7 0
3 years ago
how can we interpret and compare speeches from president lincoln and Obama, and from Frederick Douglass, to help us analyze the
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

I have a short article included to help.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative continues to be a popular pedagogical text for high school and college curricula for the didactic reason that Douglass is a strong advocate for the benefits of reading and writing. Responding to the rumor that he might have been a well-educated freeman masquerading as a runaway slave, the educational elements of Douglass’s autobiography were partially intended to explain the source of his eloquence—tracing his beginning lessons in penmanship with neighborhood boys in Baltimore to his clandestine reading of The Columbian Orator. By including the letter he forged in his first escape attempt, he implies the message that literacy set him free. Setting a precedent for many African American literary figures who came after him, including Ralph Ellison’s fictionalized Invisible Man and the real-life President Barack Obama, Douglass fashioned a compelling explanation of his coming-to-voice, which even competes with, and eventually eclipses, the drama of his escape in the book’s final chapters.

One of the most dramatic emblems of Douglass’s literary education is the moment he becomes moved to address the ships on the Chesapeake Bay—it is a picture in words of his oratorical birth. In William Lloyd Garrison’s preface to Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative, he celebrates the theatrical scene: Reduced to total abjection by the brutality of his slavemaster Covey, Douglass retreats to the Chesapeake shore on Sunday, and gives a moving speech to the white-sailed ships on the horizon. Performing as if he were on stage, Douglass laments his misery, questions whether there is a God, and concludes that since Covey is probably going to kill him anyway, he might as well try to escape. According to Garrison, Douglass’s oratorical tableau is the visual and literary epitome of the basic human desire for freedom—a “whole Alexandrine library of thought, feeling, and sentiment” (7). Like Garrison’s investment in The Liberator’s 1850 masthead, adapting Josiah Wedgwood’s image of a shackled and kneeling slave asking, “Am I not a man and a brother?,” Garrison points Douglass’s readers to this moving portrait of suffering with the hope that they, too, will vicariously experience the slave’s resolution for freedom.1 Although Garrison seems to have hoped that the scene would principally inspire sympathy for Douglass among his white readers, in Douglass’s hands it also turns into a representation of literary agency with lasting significance for African American literature. Douglass’s figure of himself—embodied in words—as communicating with the nation is echoed in similar moments of coming-to-voice in African American literary figures to the present day, and has become one of the most enduring elements of his rhetorical legacy.

Douglass’s waterside speech is a curiously artistic milestone in antislavery testimony even beyond its anguished desperation. Garrison might have pointed to many other dramatic passages—such as the whipping of Aunt Hester, the slave auction, the abandonment of Douglass’s grandmother, or even the fight with Covey—but he chose instead to highlight this highly literary, if not overwrought, transformational moment in Douglass’s consciousness. In his essay on the aesthetic elements of Douglass’s Narrative, written over forty years ago, Albert Stone argued this speech was an expression of Douglass’s artistic impulses to imaginatively synthesize his thought processes concerning freedom (72).2 But put more bluntly, he might have admitted that Douglass probably never gave this speech at all. Part of what makes Douglass’s first autobiography so effective is his ability to blend his largely factual account of slavery so seamlessly with the inventions of art. Like his deliberately falsified account of his grandmother’s abandonment and death, whose purple passages remained in his autobiographies even after he admitted that they were not true, Douglass’s speech is one of the more glaring examples of his departure from conventional fact in telling his story

6 0
3 years ago
What is an enduring issue related to Jewish Diaspora?
Mumz [18]
Im really not sure what it is
5 0
3 years ago
How did Adam Smith believe individuals would help their home countries economies without government regulation
ikadub [295]

Answer:

He believed that more wealth to common people would benefit a nation's economy and society as a whole.

Explanation:

In The Wealth of Nations, Smith described a self-regulating market. It was self-regulating because people produced according to what people would buy and people consumed according to what they wanted and could afford.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a 750 word essay, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a compromise such as the Missouri Compromise. Decide whether co
    7·1 answer
  • Cause and effect of Venezuela winning formal independence in 1821
    8·1 answer
  • What was the negative side effect of Rome's expansion​
    9·2 answers
  • Independence in Latin America was fraught with rivalry, boundary disputes, and class stratification. Which one met the most succ
    14·2 answers
  • How did the southern delegates of the Democratic Party view the slavery issue?
    10·2 answers
  • Which areas are currently under the administration of the Palestinian authority? select two options
    15·2 answers
  • The differences in the economic development of the mid-Atlantic, New England, and Southern colonies can BEST be attributed to th
    5·2 answers
  • What was siddhathas religon
    9·1 answer
  • Determine how natural barriers can impact a society.
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the condition of the farmers during the mid-1920s
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!