1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
13

did nations with strong central governments achieve more stability than those with less autocratic governments? Why or why not?

 I will give brainliest 
History
2 answers:
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
4 0

First of all, it is important to highlight that a strong central government does not equal an autocratic one. However, if you are comparing governments with a single leader that has a lot of power and governments with a more balanced distribution of power, then autocratic governments tend to be less  stable than governments who distribute power among several leaders.

The main reason for this is that a single, strong leader can be more conducive to abuse and corruption. If every decision depends on the judgement of a single person, that person might feel tempted to use power for his own benefit. This reduces accountability to the people, and leads to personal interests being more important than the interests of the nation.

On the other hand, when power is well-distributed, institutions have a system of checks and balances. This means that it is much harder to abuse power. It is also more difficult to put your interests ahead of the nation's interests. Finally, this strategy leads to slower change because it requires dialogue and cooperation, and slow changes usually contribute to stability.

Otrada [13]3 years ago
3 0
A strong central government is unitary states, which means that this kind of government has a distinct power at the various levels authorized or delegated to its member states. This kind of governance could have more achievement than autocratic governance its because autocracy has only one person has the right of everything in the states. Which means that he or she can control everything and it could lead to disaster and rebellion 
You might be interested in
What does article II of the Constitution describe?
g100num [7]
Article 2<span> of the United States </span>Constitution<span> is the section that makes the executive branch of the government. The Executive branch of the government is the branch that has the responsibility and authority for the administration throughout the day of the state.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What are the benefits and risks of abolishing the electoral college? Do you believe that the Electoral College should be abolish
melisa1 [442]

Answer: the benefits and risks of abolishing the elctoral college are that for one we are going to start off with the benefits of it!

Benefits:

1.)The electoral college makes sure everyone is involved in choosing on who gets to be the next president during election time.

2.) The electoral college guarantees fairness to the outcome of the next president

Risks:

1.) It might slow down election process and things might be based more off of people being biased

2.) Everyone might not have the same say so on who the next president will be

In my opinion i think that the electoral college shouldnt be abolished because as much as a cliche as it is we really do rely on the electoral college on terms of fairness and getting everyones voice heard. I hope this helps you! please mark brainliest!

4 0
3 years ago
Why did colonists value local militias
vova2212 [387]
In this period, the minutemen were created.  They could be ready for battle in a moments notice.
Paul Revere, was a horseback rider who spread the word that the British were coming.  He warned a group of minutemen multiple different times, along with countless number of other horseback riders.
6 0
3 years ago
How did European nations compete for power in the years before World War I?
Korolek [52]
Europeans competed for power either through acquisition of colonies or building up its industries. When their industries were strong, they would strengthen their armies as well.  If that was not enough they would form alliances with other countries to protect their interest.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Are "the Mrs. of Nassau County" for or against the passage of the Child Labor
Ymorist [56]

The  Mrs. of Nassau County in the telegram are against the passage of the child labor amendment.

<h3>What is child labor?</h3>

This is the term that has to do with the use of the people that are of a very young age who are children to carry out works in the industries in the United States especially during the period of the American revolution.

The telegram that was written here, is trying to condemn the actions of the people that passed the law. They felt that the law was interfering in the rights of homes that the people in the families should be the ones that would have to decide what they want for their children and their families.

According to the telegram, the issues of exploitation of Child labor was not enough reasons for it to be forfeited. According to the author she felt that it was their birth right.

Hence The  Mrs. of Nassau County is speaking against the intervention of the government on the issues of the use of child as laborers.

Read more on child labor here: brainly.com/question/26978389

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Will there ever be another social movement in america of the same magnitude and impact as the civil rights movement of the 1960s
    12·1 answer
  • Besides cultivating liberty gardens, how did American women contribute to the United States' war efforts?
    5·2 answers
  • How is government in the United States today different from government in ancient anthens
    14·1 answer
  • What were the similarities and differences between the religious ideas and practices of
    11·1 answer
  • Is the writing system that was created by the ___people.
    8·1 answer
  • What role does the Lieutenant Governor play in state government?
    15·1 answer
  • Which are examples of new security measures that were established after September 11, 2001? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Which practice does the photo above show that Progressive leaders were trying to regulate? A. indentured servitude B. assembly l
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Mandela’s point of view on the use of violence against the apartheid government change in the early 1960s?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following world events was shaped by the digital technology described in the passage?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!