1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
13

did nations with strong central governments achieve more stability than those with less autocratic governments? Why or why not?

 I will give brainliest 
History
2 answers:
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
4 0

First of all, it is important to highlight that a strong central government does not equal an autocratic one. However, if you are comparing governments with a single leader that has a lot of power and governments with a more balanced distribution of power, then autocratic governments tend to be less  stable than governments who distribute power among several leaders.

The main reason for this is that a single, strong leader can be more conducive to abuse and corruption. If every decision depends on the judgement of a single person, that person might feel tempted to use power for his own benefit. This reduces accountability to the people, and leads to personal interests being more important than the interests of the nation.

On the other hand, when power is well-distributed, institutions have a system of checks and balances. This means that it is much harder to abuse power. It is also more difficult to put your interests ahead of the nation's interests. Finally, this strategy leads to slower change because it requires dialogue and cooperation, and slow changes usually contribute to stability.

Otrada [13]3 years ago
3 0
A strong central government is unitary states, which means that this kind of government has a distinct power at the various levels authorized or delegated to its member states. This kind of governance could have more achievement than autocratic governance its because autocracy has only one person has the right of everything in the states. Which means that he or she can control everything and it could lead to disaster and rebellion 
You might be interested in
Which country ruled Palestine as a mandate from 1920 to 1948?
statuscvo [17]
Britain<span> governed this area under a League of Nations mandate from 1920 to 1948.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Union army's devastating march through Georgia from Atlanta to Savannah led by General William T Sherman intended to demoral
Papessa [141]

Answer:

(B) Sherman's march to the sea

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
An important environmental debate in the United States in 1900 was
xz_007 [3.2K]
Preserving natural areas in the United States was major debate at the turn of the century. Theodore Roosevelt was the major leader in preserving wilderness and was essential in creating the natural parks. While other politicians wanted to cut down trees to build cities and factories, naturalists wanted to save the natural beauty of the United States.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Europeans treat the slaves so badly during the Middle Passage? A. A slave who was treated badly was considered more
Ugo [173]

Answer B: They viewed them as property rather than as people

The Middle Passage was the stage of the triangular trade in which millions of Africans were forcibly transported to the New World as part of the Atlantic slave trade. Ships departed Europe for African markets with manufactured goods, which were traded for purchased or kidnapped Africans, who were transported across the Atlantic as slaves; the slaves were then sold or traded for raw materials, which would be transported back to Europe to complete the voyage. Voyages on the Middle Passage were large financial undertakings, generally organized by companies or groups of investors rather than individuals

Slaves' treatment was horrific because the captured African men and women were considered less than human; they were "cargo", or "goods", and treated as such; they were transported for marketing.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Homo erectus was the first species to travel outside of ________. A. South America B. Asia C. Africa D. Europe
Gnesinka [82]
The answer is C out of Africa
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the greeks influence my life
    6·1 answer
  • How did john Winthrop change the government of Massachusetts
    14·1 answer
  • President Richard Nixon followed a policy of détente or an easing of relation with......1. cuba 2.china 3.the soviet union 4.nor
    15·1 answer
  • What was ancient Rome like when it was first settled?
    10·1 answer
  • What did Patrick Henry say to American legislatures about taxes?
    11·1 answer
  • What kind of films and radio programs we can popular during the great depression
    5·1 answer
  • I can't figure this one out i could use some help
    9·1 answer
  • 13.Why could some people claim that President Jefferson's decision was illegal? (1 Point)
    14·1 answer
  • Which amendment protected the voting rights of African American men?
    7·2 answers
  • Which result did the 1944 senatorial election have in Arkansas? beginning of six terms in office for Orval Faubus an investigati
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!