The answer is D, <span>The NWSA worked for a constitutional amendment granting suffrage; the AWSA fought for suffrage at the state level.
</span>
Answer:
He became reckless, self-indulgent and inconsistent, causing a loss of loyalty by his men and officers. He had always had a violent temper and been rash, impulsive and stubborn. The drinking made these traits worse. He began to press his men too hard.
Explanation:
<em>I really really really hope this helps have a wonderful day</em>
<h3><em>Answer </em><em>:</em><em> </em><em>Mt </em><em>Everest</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>the </em><em>highest</em><em> </em><em>peak </em><em>in </em><em>the </em><em>world.It </em><em>is </em><em>situated</em><em> </em><em>at </em><em>Nepal.</em></h3><h3><em> </em></h3><h3><em>Explain:</em><em> </em><em>Mt </em><em>Everest</em><em> </em><em>height</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>8</em><em>8</em><em>4</em><em>8</em><em>.</em><em>8</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>meter </em><em>.</em></h3>
The arrest of a criminal suspect.
If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...." There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.
Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966. Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights. After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
