Answer:
less than zero
Explanation:
According to the law of demand, an increase in price reflects in a decrease in demad. That is, price and demand are inversely proportional. Since ax is associated with the price of good X, it must be negative to accurately describe that behavior in the demand function.
Thus, ax will be: less than zero.
Answer:
-3.91%.
Explanation:
The Duration Adjustment (% change in bond price) is given by:
= (Duration) * (Change in yield in %)
= -(7.81) x (0.5%)
= -3.91%
The Convexity Adjustment is given by:
= 0.5 * Convexity * (Change in yield, as a fraction)^2
= 0.5 * 99.87 * (0.005)^2
= 0.5 * 99.87 * 0.000025
= 0.001248375
= 0.0012%
Thus, the convexity correction is 0.0012%
Thus, the total change in bond price = -3.91% + 0.0012% = -3.91%.
Answer:
the nominal annual interest rate on the payment plan is 15%
Explanation:
According to the question, a one-time payment for the speakers will cost $1,000
An installmental payment will have a $150 down payment and then another $100 fro ten subsequent months.
Calculating the total payment at tthe end of the payment plan will give
$150 + ($100 x 10months)
we have, $150 + $1,000 = $1,150.
This shows that at the end of the payment plan, the set of speakers would have cost $1,150 instead of $1,00 one-time payment.
Step 2:
To calculate the interest rate, we subtract the one-time price from the payment plan price and express it as a percentage of the one time price to get tthe interest rate.
$1,150-$1,000 = $150
then we have,
($150 ÷ $1,000) × 100%
= 0.15 × 100%
- 15%
The nominal annual interest rate is 15%.
Cheers.
Answer: Corporate Social Responsibility
Explanation:
The corporate social responsibility is one of the type business model that supporting the various types applications which is ethically oriented and it also manage all the functions in an organization.
The main objective of the corporate social responsibility is that it helps in boost the morale of an employee and also helps in increase productivity of the company.
According to the given question, the shoes firm TOMS denote the shoes to the needy children and this is one of the example of the corporate social responsibility in an organization.
Therefore, Corporate Social Responsibility is the correct answer.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
