Answer:
cattle + owned = cow
Explanation:
you take the c in cattle and the ow in owned and you get cow
Answer:
He is the antagonist of the story who constantly thwarts the boy's attempts to express his feelings toward the girl.
Explanation:
The main idea of the story, "Araby," is the loss of innocence and the better understanding of romance.
Direct characterization is when an author clearly states in the text what kind of personality the character has. For example, if the author writes " Cidney was always sad" That would be direct characterization. Indirect characterization would be " Cidney always seemed to be frowing or pouting" which would then lead you to believe she's always sad. Both of those examples pretty much mean the same thing exept one is direct and the other is making you infer.
Answer:
They can never leave the hiding place, because it is not safe.
Explanation:
It explains in the text that she can not go down on sunday or to listen to the radio. That rules out the the last option. He says you must never leave, because it isn't safe, so that rules out the first option and the second option. The text explains that they should never leave because it isn't safe and that is what the 3rd answer says.
The ruling I would make on the charge of treason against John Brown, is guilty. Since the belief in transcendentalism is basically to be living on your own and not living under the government many are able to see how this may be illegal and wrong to the government. This also just gives people the opportunity to do whatever they want whether or not it is good or bad. Also, John Brown was convicted of treason due to the murder of five men and inciting a slave insurrection. I understand where John Brown was coming from, in the fact that slavery is wrong and should have been abolished. But there comes a time where we cannot recreate the actions of our enemies to retaliate, we must bring about a peaceful measure to combat these problems or else we become no better than our enemies. Then there was Ralph Waldo Emerson who just so happened to be a transcendentalist. He believed he did not have to live under the government and pay taxes and follow their society rules. He wrote poetry and he was a essayist he led the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century. I don't think transcendentalism is the answer to our problems with the government, it just makes it seem like we are acting like children and pretending the problem isn't there or choosing to ignore everything around us and act like we live in a bubble. This is why I believe John Brown should be guilty.
i just added more words to help reach the 250 word count :) hope this helps!
