Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
Mexico
Explanation:
The history of the churro is the subject of much debate. Three countries claim ownership of the snack: Spain, China, and Portugal.
Before the annual “Blue versus Red” football game, Sara bet on the blue team who later lost. After the game, she claimed she knew the blue team would lose. This illustrates hindsight bias which is also known as knew it all long effector tiptoeing determinism. It is the disposition after an event has occurred, to see the event as having been expectable in spite of there having been little or no objective basis for forecasting it. It is multifaceted phenomenon that can affect can cause exciting methodological problems while trying to analyze, understand and interpret results in investigational studies. In Additional, one example of the hindsight bias is when after viewing the outcome of a potentially unforeseeable event a person believe he or she “knew it all along.”
Muhammad Yunus, The Grameen bank founder, was highly successful in applying social incentives through group responsibility to maximize loan repayment rates and created an incentive for other banks to offer similar loans to the poor.
Since Professor Muhammad Yunus founded Grameen Bank in 1976, several economists have analyzed the Grameen Bank's success in trying to eradicate poverty in Bangladesh, either theoretically or empirically. He used social incentives through group responsibility to maximize loan repayment rates and created an incentive for other banks to offer similar loans to the poor.
Social incentives refer to a wide variety of interpersonal motivations and rewards that encourage people to act in a socially valued and approved manner. Projecting a positive reputation and social image, obtaining social acceptance, and moving up the social hierarchy are all examples of social incentives.
To learn more about social incentives :brainly.com/question/3579101
#SPJ4
Answer:
No of stock = 1100
Price of Stock = 29
Short sale = 31900
Initial Margin % = 55%
Initial Margin = 17545
Total value = 49445
The earnings of the sale is 31900, which is deposited in our account for a total account value of $49,445 (31900+55%)
Maintenance Margin = 40%
Margin Call Value = 49445/ (1+0.4)
Margin Call Value = 35317.86
Price per share = 35317.86 / 1100
Price per share = 32.11
So a margin call will be triggered when the price of the shorted security rises to $32.11
Margin Call Price = 32.11
Account Equity = 32.11*1100
Account Equity = 35318
