All categories

3 years ago

Rextacular Manufacturing Company reported the following materials data for the month ending June 30, 2016:

Business

1 answer:

dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Material used = $855,000

Explanation:

The computation of the cost of direct material used is shown below;

Material purchased = $828,000

Add:

Opening Inventory = $279,000

Less:

Closing Inventory = ($252,000)

Material used = $855,000

we simply applied the above formula so that the cost of direct material used could come

Hence, the cost of direct material used in production is $855,000

You might be interested in

RuthAnn is 28 years old and is retiring at the age of 65. When she retires, she estimates that she will need an annual income of

inessss [21]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

From her current age of 28 to her retirement age of 65, RuthAnn has (65 - 28 =) 37 more years to work.

If she saves 11% of her annual income of $36,278.13 into a 401(k), she will be setting aside (11% * 36,278.13 =) $3,990.59 into the 401(k) account annually.

At 7.1% compounding rate, in 37 years, RuthAnn would have set aside an amount estimated by the future value of an annuity formula.

$FV = \frac{A(1+r)^{n} - 1}{r}$

where FV is the future value, the amount that would have been set aside,

A = is the annual savings,

r = is the compounding rate, and

n = is the number of years.

Therefore, the total amount that would be saved up after 37 years =

$FV = \frac{3,990.59(1+0.071)^{37} - 1}{0.071}$

= (3,990.59 * 11.6535)/0.071

= $654,990.31.

By spending $32,523 annually from an account earning 7.1% compound interest rate for 30 years, the present value of the total amount needed by RuthAnn today that will be sufficient for her retirement spending can be estimated using the present value of an annuity formula.

$PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}$

= $PV = \frac{32,523(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}$

= (32523 * 0.8723)/0.071

= $399,574.83.

Since the amount saved up ($654,990.31) is more than the total amount required for RuthAnn's retirement ($399,574.83), RuthAnn has more than sufficient to meet her Retirement goal.

Specifically, the amount she has saved up can support a maximum annual spending which can be estimated from the present value of an annuity formula.

$PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}$

where PV = the amount saved up, $654,990.31,

A = the annual spending which we are estimating,

r = the 7.1% compound interest rate,

n = the number of years to retirement.

$654,990.31 = \frac{A(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}$

= 654,990.31 = (A * 0.8723)/0.071

= A = 654,990.31/0.8723 * 0.071

= A = 53,312.29

Thus, the amount saved up can support a maximum retirement spending of $53,312.29, which is higher than the $32,523 annual income needed by RuthAnn for her retirement.

6 0

3 years ago

Why does an unsecured loan have a higher interest rate than a secured loan?

salantis [7]

The banker has a set amount he or she can say yes it ok for the loan .
after that the banker has to ask the manager then the manger has to ask people higher up so what happens is in the bank when they have to get others opinions what happens is they share the cost of the loan if not payed back as a loss to both not just one

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Myers Company acquired a 60% interest in Gannon Corporation on December 31, 2020 for $1,775,000. During 2021, Gannon had net inc

miskamm [114]

Answer:

The answer is $2,225,000

Explanation:

Cost of acquisition is $1,775,000

Meyer company's share of net income in Gannon corporation:

60% of $1,000,000

0.6 x $1,000,000

= $600,000

Meyer company's share from cash dividend in Gannon corporation

60% of $250,000

0.6 x $250,000

= $150,000

The balance in the equity investment account at December 31, 2021 should be:

$1,775,000 + $600,000 – $150,000

= $2,225,000

6 0

3 years ago

I get $200 revenue from the sale of my product each day. I rent the factory that I use for $90 a day. The raw materials of the o

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

Accounting loss of $5

Economic loss of $35

Explanation:

Accounting profit is the net of revenue and Explicit cost. Explicit costs are the cost which actually incurred or paid.

On the other hand the economic profit is the net of revenue, Explicit and Implicit costs. Implicit value is the opportunity costs of choosing the alternative.

Implicit cost = $30

Explicit cost = 90 + 115 = $205

Accounting Profit = Revenue - Explicit costs = $200 - $205 = ($5)

Economic Profit = Revenue - Explicit cost - Implicit cost = $200 - $205 - $30

Economic Profit = ($35)

7 0

3 years ago

You can buy property today for $2.9 million and sell it in 5 years for $3.9 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.

nignag [31]

Answer:

a) $2, 654,000 or approximately $2.654 million

b) The investment is not attractive because the present value of the future cash flow at $2.654 million is less than the investment of $2.9 million

c) $3.413 million approximately

d) This property is attractive as the present value of $3.413 is higher than the investment of $2.9 million

Explanation:

The A part of the questions is to determine the present value of property

Information given

Future value = $3.9 million

Interest rate = 8%

The period = 5 years

The present value formula = Future value / (1+r)∧n

= $3,900,000 / 1.08∧5

= 2,654,274.46843163

= $2, 654,000 or approximately $2.654 million

b) Is the property attractive...

The investment is not attractive because the present value of the future cash flow at $2.654 million is less than the investment of $2.9 million

c) Compute a new present value based on cash flow of $190,000

The present value

= 190,000/ 1.08∧1 + 190,000/ 1.08∧3 + 190,000/ 1.08∧3 + 190,000/ 1.08∧4 +190,000/ 1.08∧5 + 3,900,000/ 1.08∧5

= 175,929.93 + 162,894.38 + 150,828.13 + 139,655.67 + 129,310.81 + 2,654,274.47= 3,412,889.38

= $3.413 million approximately

d) This property is attractive as the present value of $3.413 is higher than the investment of $2.9 million

3 0

3 years ago