1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
3 years ago
12

"Knowing how to use fire may have helped the early humans who left Africa 50,000 to 60,000 years ago to cope with colder conditi

ons in Europe. It may also have given them a big advantage over the resident Neanderthals they encountered. By 35,000 years ago the Neanderthals, a sub-species of human whose own origins were in Africa, were mostly extinct." From The Telegraph, Article on Stone Age humans (2009). Which of the following claims about hominids would this passage provide evidence for?
History
1 answer:
Anettt [7]3 years ago
5 0
Let us go over every choice:
D) D is incorrect; Neanderthals were a hominid species and a relatively advanced one since they lived very closely in time to homo sapiens (modern man). Neanderthals used to live in Europe and had been living there before modern man came from Africa.
C) This is not precise. While it could have been used as a weapon, nowhere in the passage can we see a hint for that. It might have helped modern humans in other ways, making them more reliably survive cold periods and thus displacing the resident Neanderthals.
B) This is also not precise. While the passage implies that fire might have been an important factor for the migration, quite possibly there could be other important aspects of migration to learn. Also, the passage says "may have helped", it is not too definitive.
A) THIS IS THE CORRECT CHOICE. The only concrete fact of the passage is the fact that Neandertals went extinct after the arrival of the modern man. The passage in whole is arguing that since fire is so important in Europe and the Neanderthals did not have access to it, we could attribute their extinction to the modern humans having fire as a competitive advantage.
You might be interested in
Which group took americans hostage in 1979
Irina18 [472]

D. Iranien militants

6 0
4 years ago
Who was the “rites controversy” between
Alla [95]
Roman Catholic missionaries over the religiosity of Confucianism and Chinese rituals during the 17th and 18th centuries.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did mexico want independence from spain
Scilla [17]

They didn't want another country to boss them around and rule them.

4 0
3 years ago
identify three event that led to the civil war.Explain how each one was an important cause of the war.
Ksju [112]

States' Rights

The idea of states' rights was not new to the Civil War. Since the Constitution was first written there had been arguments about how much power the states should have versus how much power the federal government should have. The southern states felt that the federal government was taking away their rights and powers.

Slavery

At the heart of much of the South's issues was slavery. The South relied on slavery for labor to work the fields. Many people in the North believed that slavery was wrong and evil. These people were called abolitionists. They wanted slavery made illegal throughout the United States. Abolitionists such as John Brown, Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and Harriet Beecher Stowe began to convince more and more people of the evil of slavery. This made the South fearful that their way of life would come to an end.

Secession

When Lincoln was elected, many of the southern states decided they no longer wanted to be a part of the United States. They felt that they had every right to leave. Starting with South Carolina, eleven states would eventually leave the United States and form a new country called the Confederate States of America. Abraham Lincoln said they did not have the right to leave the United States and sent in troops to stop the South from leaving. The Civil War had begun.

4 0
3 years ago
Why is it so difficult for historians to arrive at an interpretation of past events that is universally accepted? A. A historica
Romashka [77]

C - Historians have different biases and points of view than influence their interpretations

Which is why it it so difficult for historians to arrive at an interpretation of past events that is universally accepted. Most history is also written by the 'victors' so it is typically written from only one POV.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did native americans migration differ from that of americans?
    14·1 answer
  • at the beginning of the novel”from night “ by elie weisel where is weisel in the begging of the novel?
    10·1 answer
  • One of Buddha's Noble Eightfold Paths to relieve suffering and end desire is to
    5·1 answer
  • What did the anti- bribary treaty do? what effects did it have?
    13·1 answer
  • Which items describe people’s interactions with other their environment?
    11·2 answers
  • Hammurabi is best known for his____
    12·2 answers
  • Why did japan attack pearl harbor pre-emptively?​
    15·1 answer
  • Why do companies choose to outsource work?
    12·2 answers
  • Any help please<br><br>i need help !<br>i am running out of time
    12·1 answer
  • Will name brainliest
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!