Answer:
Values Statement.
Explanation:
Value Statement: It shows that what an organization believes in, what are their values, where does the company stands in terms of morality. Moreover, value statement reflects the priority of the company and tells if it is inclined towards profit or collective goods more.
<em>As</em> the whole foods communicated that they don't want any harm towards the planet and claim themselves as responsible ones to care for this planet, it suggests that this is their value statement.
Answer:
Anyone who is injured by a defective product may sue the manufacturer, merchants and all others who handled the product.
Explanation:
Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a person responsible for the damages or loss caused by his or her acts or omissions. In torts, strict liability is the doctrine that imposes liability on a party or person without a finding of fault. A finding of fault would be negligence or tortious intent.
Strict liability is an important factor in maintaining safety in high-risk environments by encouraging individuals, employers, and other parties to implement the means to prevent injuries and damages. Construction, manufacturing, and other potentially dangerous work settings are typically subject to strict liability.
Answer:
C. A price reduction that a producer gives to resellers to encourage
them to promote products
Explanation:
bcuz that's what advertising allowance is
Answer:
Only the Federal Reserve -- America's independent central bank -- can instruct the Bureau of Engraving and the U.S. Mint to print more money. Typically, the Fed makes one phone call a year to the Bureau of Engraving with a request for more money to be printed.
Explanation:
Answer: adverse selection
Explanation:
From the question, we are told that an
insurance company is likely to attract customers like Clancy who want to purchase insurance because he knows better that the company that he is more likely to make a claim on a policy.
The idea above is called adverse selection. This is a situation whereby either the seller or the buyer believes that he or she has more information than the other person regarding a particular product.