The correct answer is more beneficial to the government
They strove to change this by by explaining that the country belongs to the people, not to those who are governing it.
The great depression American families and homes, millions of families lost millions of their savings as many banks collapsed in the 1930s
Answer:
Both countries remained in their territories and ended in a cease-fire agreement.
---------
hope this helps :)
Answer:
At these events, philosophers, writers, artists, scientists, and other great intellects met to discuss ideas. ... The salons and the Encyclopedia helped spread Enlightenment ideas to edu- cated people all over Europe. Enlightenment ideas also eventually spread through newspapers, pamphlets, and even political songs.
Explanation:
How did the arts and literature change as enlightenment ideas spread? Arts evolved to meet changing tastes and reflect new Enlightenment ideas. Art and music changed from BAROQUE style to the lighter ROCOCO. ... Philosophers wanted to influence change by sharing their ideas with rulers.
How did the ideas of a "just society" change during the Age of Reason? As the Enlightenment Ideas spread, many composers and musicians were inspired to create new forms of music. Art also transitioned from Baroque to Rococo style. From this a new musical form called "classical" came about and also ballets and operas.
During the enlightenment, it was believed that human reasoning can easily help in discovering truths about the world and religion.
+Deism. ...
+Liberalism. ...
+Republicanism. ...
+Conservatism. ...
+Toleration. ...
+Scientific Progress.
<h2>
Hoped this helped! <3</h2>
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
