Probability = (number of ways to succeed) / (total possible outcomes) .
The total possible results of rolling two dice is
(6 on the first cube) x (6 on the second one) = 36 possibilities.
How many are successful ? I need you to clarify something first.
You said that the 'second die' shows an odd number. When a pair
of dice is rolled, the problem usually doesn't distinguish between them.
And in fact, you said that they're "tossed together" (like a spinach and
arugula salad ?) so I would understand that they would lose their identity
unless they were, say, painted different colors, and we wouldn't know
which one is the second one.
Oh well, I'll just work it both ways:
First way:
Two identical dice are tossed.
The total is 5 and ONE cube shows an odd number.
How can that happen ?
1 ... 4
4 ... 1
3 ... 2
2 ... 3
Four possibilities. Probability = 4/36 = 1/9 = 11.1% .
=======================================
Second way:
A black and a white cube are tossed together.
The total is 5 and the white cube shows an odd number.
How can that happen:
B ... W
4 .... 1
2 .... 3
Only two possibilities. Probability = 2/36 = 1/18 = 5.6% .
1 m = 100 cm
800 m = 800 x 100 = 80000 cm
Therefore, 800 m 35 cm = 80000 cm + 35 cm = 80035 cm
Also, 154 m = 154 x 100 = 15400 cm
Therefore, 154 m 49 cm = 15449 cm
Therefore, <span>800m 35cm - 154m 49cm = 80035 cm - 15449 cm = 64586 cm = 645m 86cm</span>
The simplest ratio is 1/3. Equivalent ratios would be 3/9 and 5/15.
Answer:
Make me op
Step-by-step explanation:
84 answer. of 9*2 +18\16
Answer:
Nominal level of measurement
Step-by-step explanation:
The level of measurements used in this study is the nominal level of measurements. The nominal level of measurements involves the use of numbers to help classify the categories in an experiment.
In this case study, values were gotten for each categories which are brown hair, blonde hair, black hair and other hair colors. Thus, the level of measurements used is the nominal level of measurement.
There is something wrong with the calculation because data was gotten for a total of 600 respondents while the mean that was calculated involved only 503 omitting about 97 respondents.
