Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
Answer:
La belle indifference
Explanation:
La belle indifference an inadequately complement attitude towards their condition and physical symptoms are seen in patients with conversion disorder. It is a naive or inappropriate calmness lack of concern in the face of perception by others of one's disability and often seen in conversion disorder but no longer considered pathogenic for conversion disorder. To determine the frequency of la belle indifference refers to an apparent lack of concern shown by some patients towards their symptoms. It is often regarded typical conversion /hysteria.
Answer:
hi bestie
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation
Keukenhof,The Netherlands , is also known as the "Garden of Europe,it is one of the largest flower gardens in the world, with about seven million flowering bulbs.
Hope ,it helps you;)
Answer: The company can protect its investment from competitors by patenting the new chip.
Explanation: A patent is a declaration that prevents competitors from manufacturing a product for a designated period of time.
