Answer: C. While stocks have a higher rate of return in the long run, they are much more volatile (riskier) in the short run. As such, they have a higher probability of having less than the original value of the investment for people who might need to withdraw the investment in the short run.
Explanation:
As stated, people who need to withdraw part or all of their investments in a short time frame such as the elderly are advised to invest in bonds as opposed to stock.
To properly benefit from Stock ownership, one has to be willing to leave it for a long period of time because stocks are more volatile in the short run. If a person needs to withdraw in a short horizon and goes in on Stock, they may lose some of their money due to Capital losses if the Stock reduces in value.
Bonds on the other hand will give a steady income so that even if you wish to withdraw in a short time, you can with the probability of no losses in that short time frame.
Answer:
The amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
Explanation:
Here Mr and Mrs Dart owns a majority of shares of Wall corp, Black co, and West inc. In 2010 , wall made advanced cash to black($50,000) and west($80,000) and also west made advance to black($70,000).
While preparing the combined balance sheet for all these company's , any amount of account receivables will not be included because preparing a combined balance sheet is same as making consolidated balance sheet , were any inter company profit or losses , account receivables and payable are not included in the balance sheet , so therefore the amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
<h3>answer:</h3>
not a.
not b.
not c.
it's d.
<h3>explanation:</h3>
Lower tax rates enable firms to invest more – this leads to higher growth and therefore, higher tax revenues
Price, Supply and Demand. Amonopoly's potential to raise prices indefinitely is its most critical detriment to consumers.
Answer:
d. Cost cutting in one area of the value chain might increase costs in another.
Explanation:
Although cost leadership is an efficient way to dominate the competition,it does have potential pitfalls if not executed correctly. For example, if operating cost is decreased, the changed product feature may imply a higher marketing cost afterward. In order to be truly efficient, the cost leadership strategy has to be implemented in such a way, so it doesn't impact other value chain costs negatively (increasing them).