1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
2 years ago
10

Which statement best explains how the viewpoint in the Greenberg interview differed from that in the informational text on Thurg

ood Marshall?
A.The Greenberg interview suggests that Brown vs. Board of Education was a very important case; the informational article does not.


B.The informational article suggests that Brown vs. Board of Education was a very important case; the Greenberg interview does not.


C.The informational article provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the Greenberg interview is more distant.


D.The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
English
2 answers:
Sophie [7]2 years ago
7 0

Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.  

Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.

Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.Answer:

Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.

Explanation:

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/14526296#readmore

Setler [38]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.  

Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.

Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.

You might be interested in
Mom is the one *for whom I left the message* <br> which kind of clause are the words in bold
nignag [31]

adjective clause

hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
How many phrasal verbs are there?
Sophie [7]

There are two types of expressions of phrasal verbs.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is an objective summary of the "forgiveness triumphs" theme that is developed in Act V of Hamlet?
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

The option that contains the objective summary of "forgiveness triumphs" theme is:

B. The scene where Laertes asks forgiveness helps demonstrate that forgiveness can be more powerful than revenge.

Explanation:

<em>Exchange forgiveness with me, noble Hamlet: </em>

<em>Mine and my father's death come not upon thee, </em>

<em>Nor thine on me! [Dies.] </em>

<em>Hamlet: Heaven make thee free of it! I follow thee. </em>

<em>I am dead, Horatio. </em>

-Hamlet,William Shakespeare

<u>Laertes seeks revenge for his father's and sister's deaths, for which he blames Hamlet. However, once they are both poisoned and about to die, Laertes realizes the futility of revenge. Death conquers all. Killing someone only brings more tragedy and suffering onto oneself and others. That is why Laertes asks Hamlet to "exchange forgiveness" with him: so that they can both be free from the deadly ropes of revenge and resentment.</u>

3 0
2 years ago
Can someone help meh out plz and ty ​
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

I can't see the vocab words in the picture.

3 0
2 years ago
Read the sentences.
Contact [7]
The correct answer is the first option, 'Two teams, the Tomcats and the Huskies, battled for the city championship', because that is the only example which contains an appositive phrase, 'the Tomcats and the Huskies'. 
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did eliezer's determination to remain with his father reveal?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Emily Dickinson and her poetic style?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the exposition in the book Narnia - The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe? Where would I find the exposition in the book?
    12·1 answer
  • Eric approached the plate with as much confidence
    5·1 answer
  • Can somebody please give me some good ideas i’m not asking to write a speech or anything i just don’t know what i can write abou
    8·1 answer
  • When the Europeans arrived how many Native American tribes were there, and how many languages did they speak?
    12·1 answer
  • Write an argument summary about how education does not prepare students for the real world. Also give three reason that support
    13·1 answer
  • Combine sentences, using clause or phrase of reason:<br> It's raining, so we stay at home.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a mouse and a sunda tiger
    12·2 answers
  • Which example of media would best set the mood for a speaker giving a presentation about the lack of affordable housing in a cit
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!