Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
180 = 24 x
7.5 = x
angle P = 85
angle Q = 45
angle R = 50
No this triangle is scalene because the sides nor the angles are congruent.
The income statement illustrates that the net income will be $3530.
<h3>How to calculate the income statement?</h3>
The income statement will be:
<u>Revenue</u>
Consulting revenue 18350
<u>Expenses</u>
Miscellaneous expenses 720
Rent expense 4820
Salaries expense 8370
Telephone expenses 910
Total expenses 14820
Net income = 18350 - 14820 = 3530
Learn more about income statement on:
brainly.com/question/24498019
#SPJ1
You have to look at the equation and find a common factor bettween all parts. SO, we see they all have an x, so that is the first thing you can factor out. They also have
2x(5x2 4x -3) C
Answer:12cm
Step-by-step explanation:3+3+3+3 because its 3x3 so their is 3cm on each side