1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
10

Question 2 (1 point)

History
1 answer:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
6 0

President Lincoln was worried border states would secede if he let them fight  that's why he did not want African Americans to fight in the civil war.

Option: B

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass wanted that African and Americans should be allowed to join the fight as the north needed more able fighters to win the fight. In the mean time president Abraham Lincoln did not want African-Americans to fight in the civil war because he was afraid that border states would secede if they join the fight.

Lincoln was against the slavery system. He wanted to abolish the system. But North did not want them to be a part of the war whereas to abolish the slavery system they need to fight in the civil war from the north.

You might be interested in
What was joseph galloway's purpose in writing the letter to the new york gazette on august 1765
Nina [5.8K]

Galloway's purpose in writing the letter was to point out his solution to the problem of colonists resisting the imposition of taxes by the British government. It was the first impulse of what would later be known as the Galloway's Plan of Union, which consisted in creating a parliament of American colonists who would oversee the decisions the British parliament had for the new continent.

In the letter, Galloway recognized the burden of sustaining the colonies  as being a reasonable cause for the United Kingdom to tax colonists, but recognized the inability of the later to pay due to the trading restrictions set by the English.

He suggested that if colonists considered the impositions too heavy, they should refer to more rational methods than rioting to let the British understand that they couldn't pay the taxes, for example by sending American representatives to the British parliament.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the British government win India was know for
34kurt
I think it was its set up
4 0
3 years ago
After the war of 1812, the war hawks took over leadership of the Republican Party. Which positions did the war hawks favor
bagirrra123 [75]

hough the War of 1812 was dubbed “Mr. Madison’s War,” his role in the prosecution of the war was relatively ineffectual. Elected in 1808, President James Madison was intimately familiar with the ongoing diplomatic and trade conflicts with Britain. As Secretary of State under President Jefferson, he was the principal architect of the “restrictive system” of trade embargos designed to force Britain to relax its control of Atlantic trade. Madison’s support of this failed system lasted well into the war itself.

Madison’s attempts to resolve disagreements with Britain peacefully was viewed by some in his own Republican party as a sign of weakness. A group of pro-war Republicans, led by Speaker of the House Henry Clay, argued that military force was the only option left to combat British imperiousness. These “War Hawks” were not a majority of the party, but over time, their influence acted on more skeptical party members.

President Madison eventually did bring a declaration of war to Congress, but his leadership in planning for war was mostly absent. Republican ideology was intensely skeptical of the concept of a national standing army, preferring to rely on state militias, and the Madison administration, following in the footsteps of Jefferson, did much to starve national military forces of men and material support. His influence on Congress was minimal, and in retrospect, it is hard to understand how he, or the War Hawks for that matter, felt that the United States had the necessary military resources to prosecute a war on multiple fronts.

8 0
3 years ago
2
defon

Answer:

Russia, France and Great Britain made up the triple entente

8 0
3 years ago
Which two documents can be found in the British Library?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Magna Carta

Explanation:

The national library of the United Kingdom and one of the best in the world. It has approximately 150 million publications and every year a collection of about three million new objects is incorporated.

The British Library contains books, maps, newspapers, sheet music, patents, manuscripts and stamps, among other objects. They are in 625 km of shelves that grow 12 kilometers every year. The reading space has capacity for 1200 readers.

The British Library makes information available to students and researchers in the United Kingdom and around the world. Each year, six million searches are generated with its online catalog and more than 100 million objects are offered to readers around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me with both of these please?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain in detail who could be considered "civilized" and "uncivilized" according the theory of Social Darwinism.?
    10·1 answer
  • The Puritans left England because they wanted to simplify religion.<br> t or f
    7·2 answers
  • What is Costa Rica's average yearly income?
    11·1 answer
  • What year was the louisiana territory added to the united states
    12·1 answer
  • The United States helped plantation owners revolt against Hawaii's queen by
    15·2 answers
  • Muslim traders built trading posts in Southeast<br><br> Asia and taught Islam there.
    14·1 answer
  • What did the fugitive slave act allows southern slave owners to do? Was this fair?
    15·2 answers
  • What did Austria-Hungary accusing Serbia of doing?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP!!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!