1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
3 years ago
13

Some individual states have abolished slavery in their constitutions. Confederation delegates Brad Pitt and Tom Hanks propose an

amendment to abolish slavery in the entire country. Can the Articles of Confederation solve this problem? Why/Why not?
History
1 answer:
ki77a [65]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes but no.

Explanation:

To make an amendment to the Articles of Confederation all 13 states would have to unanimously agree to the proposal to amend it.

However if even one state is opposed to abolishing slavery country wide, it cannot be done. so therefore it is extremely unlikely it could solve the problem. This was one of the articles of Confederations major flaws

You might be interested in
The Quakers rejected slavery on the grounds that: it contributed to a maldistribution of wealth. it contradicted the Christian c
Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

The Quakers rejected slavery on the grounds that it contradicted the Christian concept of brotherhood.

Explanation:

The Quakers are a religious movement that originated among Christian English dissenters in the mid-17th century. At the end of the 1600s, many Quaker immigrants emigrated to North America, where William Penn founded Pennsylvania.

Quakers imagine that there is something of God within every human being, which, like an inner light, can guide one. The movement emphasizes that each person must find his or her own way to God, that God exists within every human being, and that the personal experience of God is the only guidance a human can have. Therefore, as God lived in every human, even in African-Americans, men were all equal and as a consequence brothers under God. This religious view, therefore, made them reject slavery during the 19th Century.

7 0
2 years ago
Choose the answer that lists three barbarian tribes that threatened the roman empire in the fourth and fifth centuries
Tanya [424]
The question ask to choose among the following choices that states the list of three barbarian tribes that threatened the Roman Empire in the fourth and the fifth century A.D. and based on my research, I would say that the answer among them is in letter D. Vandals, Ostrogoths, Huns. I hope this would help my firend
5 0
2 years ago
India's religious beliefs can be traced back how many years? More than 3000 more than 4000 more than 1000 more than 2000
NARA [144]

Buddhism and Hinduism in India begin to emerge between 500 and 300 years BC with the kingdom of the Mahajanapadas, who created books called Upanishads, these are texts that form the theoretical basis of classical Hinduism

The correct answer is more than 2000 years ago approximately 2700 years ago  


I hope it help you

6 0
2 years ago
2 Points
Usimov [2.4K]
C The Aztec Empire was conquered by Hernán Cortés in 1519
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were supreme courts views on corporation rights in late 1880s
Tomtit [17]

Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] In the United States and most countries, corporations have a right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that point. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood


5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who or what is to blame for World War II? Why?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the followers of john Calvin in Scotland called
    11·2 answers
  • Identify a key person from the Cold War and explain who they are
    5·1 answer
  • Who was Andrew Jackson Smith? Brainliest
    12·2 answers
  • What impact did the establishment of French and Dutch colonies in North America have on Native Americans?
    11·1 answer
  • How can the use of technology in industry benefit workers
    5·1 answer
  • Which concepts best relate to the ideas of Thomas Hobbes? Check all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • How marvy levels does the federal court system have, and what are the levels?
    11·1 answer
  • What happened to the native Americans that fought for England during war?
    15·2 answers
  • Photosynthesis moves carbon atoms from the atmosphere to the biosphere
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!