The correct answer is <span>Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña
In this case, the supreme court decided that even in such cases it could be unconstitutional and that each individual case there should be a process of strict scrutiny of the events, which is the most strict way of observing something and the most thorough. The case was related to to both the analysis of the 14th and the 5th amendment.</span>
Answer:
... Hey my other account just got banned lol
Explanation:
Answer:
They do not create nor enforce the law but instead interpret it
Explanation:
A general rule to remember is that there are checks and balances that all three parts of government contribute in and the U.S. Supreme Court specifically aims to dispute the ethical issues behind laws (mostly lead to land mark cases) and laws that relate to the constitution (like the Bill of Rights and the amendments)
Answer:
I wouldn't really add anything except for making it really specific so people can't find loopholes or exceptions.
Explanation:
Answer:
they developed calenders, astronomy, hieroglyphic writing, pyramids, temples and many other things
