In times of war, freedom of speech may be limited more in comparison to wartime.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court ruling in Schenk vs. US established a new precedent in terms of free speech. If the speech in question did not pass the "clear and present danger" test, than it is not constitutionally protected.
The Supreme Court justices felt that Schenk's encouraging pamphlet to not join the US military would hurt America's chance of success in World War I. Therefor, it created a clear and present danger to the safety of American society.
