Steveeeeeeeee jobssssssssssss
Answer:
Freedom of speech
Explanation:
Freedom of speech can be regarded as a legal right that allows individuals to express freely his/her opinion. It is a principle that allows one's ideal to be projected out. In First Amendment to the Constitution in US allows free speech to speak their minds without fear of prosecution, even to the government as Americans citizen. In history the first country to allow freedom of speech is Sweden in 1766, where censorship were abolished Ana law to allow free speech was introduced. It should be noted that Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law
All territories in South America will be protected by any needs necessary (protected from communism)
From the beginning, the Lords Proprietors had difficulty in managing their new colony. There were border disputes with Virginia, Indian wars with the Tuscarora and the Yamassee, and piracy at the hands of the notorious Blackbeard and Stede Bonnet.A portion of Carolina had emerged as its own organizational unit and became the royal colony of South Carolina in 1719. Advisors to the British king recommended direct royal control of the colonies.
In 1729 seven of the eight Lord Proprietors sold their colonial holdings in Carolina to the Crown. The lone Proprietor was John Carteret, Earl Granville, who retained the Granville Tract in North Carolina without governing control until the American Revolution.
In South Carolina the last Governor appointed by the Lord Proprietors ended his term in 1719, whereas the last Governor appointed by the Lords Proprietors in North Carolina ended his term in 1731. In 1719, the new Governor of South Carolina was "elected by the people," and was considered to be the first governor of South Carolina in the "Royal Period," that is - after "the Split."
Answer: U.S. foreign policy required to better . middle class and how various U.S. foreign policies may impact them.or radically departing from them, might ultimately do more harm than good. Moreover, it could explain why some working families are amenable to policy changes.
Explanation:
