Answer: a. $39,304
Explanation:
Let us begin by calculating the yearly phone bill.
$63 per month so that is
= 63*12
= $756
A total of $756 per year is spent on the company phone.
Kailynn buys 4 sample kits at $235 per kit.
= 235*4
= $940 in total for the kits last year.
Add the two figures to get her total expenditure from the company.
=940+756
= $1696
Subtract this from her total job benefits,
=$41,000 - $1696
= $39,304
$39,304 was her total employment compensation.
Answer:
Joel is behaving in a totally unprofessional & unethical manner
Explanation:
As assistant controller, Joel Kimmel's job specification & responsibility includes financial statement preparation & combination, putting of internal controls in place, detailed analysis & reporting of cost variance, acts as the go-between with external auditors amongst other such responsibilities.
As such, when Joel discovered the cost discrepancy during the reconciliation, it was actually his responsibility to call the bank's attention to the variance. This is something that clearly falls under his job specification & can be considered as neglect of duty. Joel's decision defeats the very purpose of bank reconciliation, which is to correct any such discrepancy & to the ensure the rectification of transactions. Most importantly, the decision Joel plans to take is very unethical & is against standard accounting practices
We can therefore, say that Joel's decision is thoroughly unethical & unprofessional
Benefits: You do not have to carry large amounts of cash with you
drawbacks: You have to pay interest rates
it is technically a loan
hope this helps
Answer:
"Ordering" is the correct solution.
Explanation:
- Ordering expenses are incurred in purchasing a new shipment of manufactured goods. This would include expenditures for the attempting to place of a purchase agreement, cost savings for the evaluation including its batches expected to receive, ends up costing for documentary evidence, etc.
- The cost of ordering correlated negatively with either the cost of transport. This appears to mean because the much more purchases a business location including its providers, the significantly higher the ordering costs will indeed be.
That is false
The court would never do that , but before you would eat , you need to check if this belong to you or not