Answer:
a. Leslie, who is independent and self-confident. She doesn’t need people to tell her what to do.
b. Malcolm, who loves to play. His last boss says that Malcolm was the "chief kid" in his last office.
c. Frankie, who has been in the toy business for 10 years and who knows what he’s doing, but who always likes testing a new idea.
Explanation:
In this scenario the CEO of a start-up toy manufacturer wants to create at least 10 wildly different toys in the next three years.
He will primarily need people that are creative and are inclined to work with new ideas.
The wrong choice will be someone who follows the rules and is stable. Such a staff will not contribute new ideas that will move the company to make profits.
Leslie is confident and does not need to be told what to do, so she will take initiative to do new things.
Malcolm loves to play and this will boost creative ideas.
Frankie likes testing new ideas and will be comfortable working creatively.
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer:
(A). People may expect earnings to fall in the future, perhaps because the firm will be faced with increased competition.
Explanation:
Price Earnings ratio of a company represents market price per share of a company's stock in relation to it's earnings per share.
Price Earnings ratio(PER) is given by the following formula:
PER = 
A lower P/E Ratio indicates that a company's market price of a share is lower relative to it's earnings. This means the company's stock is undervalued.
It can also mean that the company's earnings have increased which in turn has increased it's earnings per share.
Investors in general expect lower earnings in future for the stock of a company with low P/E Ratio.
Answer: Business intelligence
Explanation: Business intelligence is a term used to describe the strategic steps taken to obtain or collect data,carry out the analysis of the data analysis, showing trends, patterns and relationship between factors, treatments and other considerations before making business decisions. Business intelligence is all in modern business processes to adequately explore the advances in technology for Business decisions making.
Answer:
C. mutual fund.
Explanation:
Mutual fund refers to a company that pools money from many investors into securities such as stocks and bonds. Mutual funds provide the service of a deversified portfolio for customers who would otherwise been unable to diversify their portfolio themselves.
