Actually, the correct answer is A. The poem starts with an indication of inevitability and ends on a note of transcendence. I just took the test.
Exposition - The introduction of the setting and the family of Keesh
Rising Action - Keesh's confrontation of the councilmen in the meeting
Climax - Keesh's return with a hunted bear
Falling Action - Sending of spies to discover Keesh's hunting strategy
Resolution - The people's acceptance of Keesh as a true hunter and not as hunter using witchcraft
The goal of the game has the text is implied is known to be an example of Paraphrasing plagiarism.
<h3>Can one get plagiarism for paraphrasing?</h3>
The Improper use of paraphrasing is known to be a very common kind of plagiarism. This happens when one remove a direct phrase from another work and alters just a few words.
This will make a person to claims the work as their own. Learning how to use paraphrase in the right way is a very vital part of good writing.
Learn more about goal from
brainly.com/question/24693533
Imagists believed that poems should have "no ideas but in things." In other words, they would described powerful images, and instead of explaining what those images meant, they would let the reader decide what the meaning or value of those images might be.
Imagists were especially fond of inviting the reader to recognize how very different sorts of images can actually be really similar. Ezra Pound famously did this with his short poem "In a Station of the Metro," which associates "faces in the crowd" with "petals on a wet, black bough."
The poem in your question does something very similar by associating the cat's footprints in the snow with the blossoming flowers of a plum tree. The writer wants you to recognize the odd visual similarity of the footprints and the flowers, ideally to show how there's a kind of cosmic connectedness in the world by (because two very different things end up being really similar).
That's why I think your best answer is A.