The answer to this question is answer choice C.
For the SSS postulate, we need 3 pairs of congruent sides. However, in the image, there are only 2 pairs.
The missing pair in the image is AC and DF. If those are congruent, the triangle can be proven congruent by the SSS postulate.
Hope this helps! :)
~AgentCozmo4, Junior Moderator
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>thinked</em><em> </em><em>number</em><em> </em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>x</em>
<em>multiply</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em>3</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>add</em><em> </em><em>4</em><em> </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>square</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>result</em>
<em></em>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>helps</em>
<em>brainliest</em><em> </em><em>appreciated</em>
<em>good</em><em> </em><em>luck</em><em>!</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>nice</em><em> </em><em>day</em><em>!</em>
2y+20=100
2y=80
y=40
The explanation for this would because because the two base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal so since the both equal to 40 degrees, in total would be 80 degrees.
Since the total degrees of a triangle is 180 and you know the base angles make up for 80 percent you subtract that from the total of the angle your trying to find, which is 2y+20.
Answer:This line contains no two such points. Hence the slope is not defined. A y intercept occurs when we make x equal to 0 . Since this is prohibited by the equation x=−3 , there is no y intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
