Answer:
The correct answer is D. The Stanford Prison Experiment was aborted because the principal researcher, Dr. Zimbardo, was able to determine that participants were being harmed because he was objectively monitoring the procedures.
Explanation:
The Stanford experiment is a study of social psychology conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971 on the effects of the prison situation, having had great social and media coverage.
It was carried out with students who played the roles of guards and prisoners. It aimed to study the behavior of ordinary people in such a context and had the effect of showing that it was the situation rather than the authoritarian personality of the participants that was at the origin of behaviors sometimes contrary to the values professed by the participants before the start of the study. The 18 subjects had been selected for their stability and maturity, and their respective roles as guards or prisoners had been conspicuously assigned to them randomly. In other words, each participant knew that the assignment of roles was only the result of chance and not of any psychological or physical predispositions. A guard could very well have been a prisoner, and vice versa.
Prisoners and guards quickly adapted to the roles they had been assigned, going beyond what had been planned and leading to truly dangerous and psychologically damaging situations. One of the conclusions of the study is that a third of the guards displayed sadistic behavior, while many prisoners were emotionally traumatized, two of them even having to be withdrawn from the experiment before the end.
Despite the worsening of the conditions and the loss of control of the experiment, only one person (Christina Maslach) among the fifty direct and indirect participants in the study opposed the continuation of the experiment for moral reasons. It was thanks to this that Professor Zimbardo became aware of the situation and stopped the experiment after six days, instead of the two weeks initially planned.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the options to answer this question. So we are going to answer it based on our knowledge of the topic.
The perspective she should include in her presentation is that poverty is a problem that must be corrected because it's a form of injustice.
When Lyla is creating her PowerPoint presentation about the social-conflict perspective on poverty she has to include the above-mentioned perspective to correctly expose the difficult issue of poverty and how it impacts not only poor people but the entire country.
Poverty is a major issue in every country and has to be understood from different angles in order to be addressed. Poverty directly impacts the lives of people, society, and the economic indicators of a nation.
Answer:
women and children were given some rights, A.
The correct answer is thrifty gene theory.
This theory, proposed by James V. Neel, was first introduced in order to prove that some people are genetically predisposed to having diabetes. However, over time, the theory expanded to encompass why people are prone to retaining weight as well.
Answer:
The answer is Valley.
Explanation:
I deeply apologize if the answer is incorrect.
I hope this helped and if it did I would appreciate it if you marked me Brainliest. Thank you and have a nice day!
