Answer:
Fear appeal.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Life insurance companies like Prudential hope to get you to worry about how your loved ones will provide for themselves once you have passed away. In order to buttress their point, they paint a very gloomy picture of the possible consequences of not having life insurance, and they make a point of recommending that you act immediately because you never know when it is going to be too late. This is an example of a fear appeal.
A fear appeal can be defined as the act of persuading potential customers to change a risky behavior by highlighting adverse or negative consequences that may arise if they do not subscribe to a service or use a particular product. The main purpose of a fear appeal is to cajole people into buying a product or using a service by using their fears as a motivation.
Answer:
$35,000 is the maximum amount that Crigui should pay
Explanation:
Total cost if manufactured internally;
Direct materials $13,000
Direct labor 15,000
Variable overhead 3,000
Fixed overhead 7,000
————
Total cost $38,000
Therefore, $38,000 - $3,000 (unavoidable cost) = $35,000
Answer:
For Juniper Enterprises to breakeven it must sell 607 units
Explanation:
To break-even means making sales where the proceeds from sales transactions equal the amount of total costs incurred,hence no gain no loss situation.
Break-even point in units=fixed cost/contribution per unit
fixed costs incurred is $8,400
contribution per unit=selling price per unit -variable cost per unit
selling price is $28
variable cost is $16.80
contribution per unit=$28-$16.80=$11.2
0
break-even in units =$6,800/$11.2
0=607 units
Answer:
Personal liability
Explanation:
Jeri and Knute are shareholders in lighthouse tours LLC. As lighthouse tours LLC is a limited liability company, Jeri and Knute enjoy limited liability.
Legally, lighthouses LLC is independent of its shareholders. It has the right to own assets and incur liabilities. Should the company get to the dissolution stage, its assets will be used to settle its obligations. If the assets of the company are not sufficient, the shareholders' private properties cannot be used to pay the debts. Jeri and Knute will be liable only to the extent of capital contribution.
Answer:
The answer is: C) lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In order for Larson to be able to rescind the contract, he would have to prove that he had reasonable reliance that Robert Redford owned that specific car. Reasonable reliance refers to a person believing something to be a fact, which any other person could reasonably believe in as well.
But exactly how could he prove that someone else might also believe that the car was previously owned by Robert Redford? I find it very doubtful that he can prove that.
