Maya Angelou’s poem “Caged Bird” symbolizes the caged birds African Americans who are caged in their own land by the whites. The cage in the poem represents the restriction of the society i.e., the natives are captivated and restricted on their own land. The captured bird has "clipped wings, tied feet, and bars of rage". They sing the song of liberty and are compared with the free birds.
Answer:
1. James was planning a dream vacation to South Korea.
2. James was especially looking forward to trying the local cuisine, including the spicy octopus stew and kimchi.
3. James will have to practice the language regularly to make it easier to communicate with people.
4. James has a long list of sights to see, including the Kimchi Field museum and the famed Seoul park.
Explanation:
The correct usage of the names and adjectives and adverbs in the following sentences are-
1. James was planning a dream vacation to South Korea.
2. James was especially looking forward to trying the local cuisine, including the spicy octopus stew and kimchi.
3. James will have to practice the language regularly to make it easier to communicate with people.
4. James has a long list of sights to see, including the Kimchi Field museum and the famed Seoul park.
The answer is A: sinking because gothic means something’s gloomy and eerie. Sinking is the only word that is gloomy and eerie. Hope this helped!
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
The answer is B because the rhythm will help the reader create an image
