Answer:
Compound
Explanation:
You can split up this sentence into two sentences and it will still be grammatically correct.
Answer: Gordimer´s political beliefs are reflected in this story in a way that she puts her view with the device os negatie dialects. For example: “art is the negative knowledge of the
actual world” (“Reconciliation Under Duress” ). Rather, art explores what is not known and
as Adorno explains, “art does not become knowledge with reference to mere immediate reality”
. Throughout her novels, Gordimer avoids references to the “immediate reality.” As Ettin
explains, we never get a full picture of the plot and instead the reader must orient himself by considering what has not been said. As Gordimer draws on the theories of Adorno, she portrays the strong appeal of this German, Jewish theorist, further distancing herself from the genre of
black authors and redefining the objective of a political novel.
The third omniscent point of view is when the narrator knows exactly what the character feels, thinks and acts. Taking this in viewpoint and looking over your question I would say option d is the answer.
I can better help you if you list the options
they are referring to the opposition of "tabula rasa", its the idea people are born without built in mental content, we develop it over time. as well as we dont have personalities or ideas when we are born, but the the molded by our experiences <span />
