1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ahrayia [7]
4 years ago
12

What do you think is the best strategy for achieving social change?

History
2 answers:
timama [110]4 years ago
8 0
To put yourself out ttheir,and remember it doesnt matter what they think of you just what you think of you
Effectus [21]4 years ago
6 0
By not being a social activist. Forcibly pushing an agenda to "change" the views of the people always results in discrimination, hate, and violence. The best way to achieve social change is on a personal level. Forget what is going on the world around you because you cannot change the views of the people around you, you can only change your own views. If you act as an tolerable individual, as a good person, and as a person who believes in treating people as human beings, you will create more of a positive effect than these so called "peaceful" protestors who think it is okay to shut down businesses, institutions, and parades in order to make a point.
You might be interested in
write a paragraph that relates the term czar to the term absolutism by giving two examples of czars and telling how they ruled a
NikAS [45]
Absolutism is a form of government where one person or small group of people have unlimited power.  The term "czar" means "caesar" ("king"), and therefore can be considered a type of absolute ruler.  Ivan the Great of Russia (r.1462-1505) took the title of "czar" after marrying the niece of the last Byzantine empire.  After the fall of Constantinople (and thus, the Byzantine Empire), Moscow became the most powerful city in the Eastern Orthodox Church.  Thus, the "czar" of Russia would from then on claim to be the inheritor of the Byzantine emperor and protector of the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Two rulers of Russia stand out as being "absolute rulers":  Peter the Great (r.1682-1725) and Catherine the Great (r.1762-1796).  Peter wanted to make Russia into a modern nation, and forced Russians to adopt European culture.  To do this, Peter created a new class of nobles that were given land in exchange for their loyalty to the government.  Nobles were given total control over their peasants, who saw their freedom decrease during Peter's rule.  To reform the government, Peter created a centralized bureaucracy of non-elected advisers and local governments were placed under the direct control of the czar.  Peter also brought the Orthodox Church under his authority and created a council of bishops appointed by him.  While many of Peter's policies improved the Russian economy, he divided the Russian people.  (See image:  Courtesy of saint-petersburg.com)

Catherine the Great began her rule by seizing power from her own husband!  Catherine greatly admired Peter I and continued to expand and modernize Russia.  Many people consider Catherine's reign a golden age of Russia because she supported the arts, education, and culture.  Despite being influenced by the European enlightenment, Catherine feared chaos and peasant uprisings were brutally crushed by her army.  She allowed nobles to treat their serfs (peasants) however they wished.  More peasants than ever were forced into serfdom than ever before, and their position worsened.  

6 0
3 years ago
Correct this article !! <br> Please help my grade is falling !!
garri49 [273]

Answer:

October 9, 2012 , sentences sometimes don't start with and

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the Southern states against protective tariffs?
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

In 1828, Congress passed a high protective tariff that infuriated the southern states because they felt it only benefited the industrialized north. But it shrunk English demand for southern raw cotton and increased the final cost of finished goods to American buyers.

7 0
3 years ago
The Marshall Plan (1948-1952) was a United States effort to assist the nations of Europe by
umka21 [38]

Answer:

D. Providing economic aid

Explanation:

After World War 2 had ended The United States Donated $12 Billion to help rebuild Western European economies in 1948. The United States wanted to rebuild areas which had been destroyed by the war with the Marshall Plan.

(The U.S. donated about $100 Billion in 2018 USD)

5 0
3 years ago
which group would not be allowed to vote or hold elective office under the provision of wade davis bill
sergij07 [2.7K]
Former Confederate government officials :) hope this helped<3
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What political practice started in Greece and carried over to Rome
    12·1 answer
  • What are 2 different ways to write 4.293
    12·2 answers
  • which of the following would be the most important change in most women in saudi arabia? A)new styles of hijabs and sharshafs B)
    12·1 answer
  • I’m democracy, government get its power from
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY I REALLY NEED THIS ANSWERED ASAP
    10·2 answers
  • Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals​
    13·1 answer
  • A² – 26² <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>please help me​
    11·1 answer
  • How did life differ in each of the three main regions of the British Colonies?
    13·1 answer
  • If the cause is king george shut down boston harbor and passed intolerable acts what is the effect
    6·1 answer
  • Write an essay explaining how Thomas Paine's pamphlet, Common Sense, made a persuasive and
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!