What did ottomans do to prove they are true Egyptians?

1 answer:

5 0

Ottomans had to prove that there was no other country of origin other than Egypt and they had blood ties with Egypt.

<u>Explanation:</u>

When there was a denial on the fact that the Ottomans were not Egyptians, they had to prove that they were tru Egyptians and did not have any other blood ties.

For this, the Ottomans had to show the evidence that these people had no other home or place of orgin other than Egypt. More over they had to proof that there was blood ties between Egypt and the Ottomans.

You might be interested in

What is democracy and why did the United states settle on this form of government

Arlecino [84]

Eash said: Democracy is a system of running organizations, businesses, and groups in which each member is entitled to vote and take part in decisions.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Declaration of Independence is BEST described as: (SSUSH4a)

andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

Explanation:

because we didn't want to take place in that type of government no more

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why should historians watch out for personal biases

aniked [119]

Because so they can avoid opinions and get the facts. Also because depending on the origin of the historian, he may have a prerequisite <span>feelings towards a culture or a nation.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Who was the only president to be sworn in without getting a single vote for president? *

xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

Gerald Ford

Explanation:

Ford has the distinction of being the first, and to date the only person to serve as president without being elected

3 0

2 years ago

Which ways did the great awakening contribute to the independent spirit of american colonists?

wlad13 [49]

The great awakening was about making people individualists when it came to religion. Moving away from institutionalized religion and into the realm of self-reflection and religion being a personal thing. Since the religion was usually tied to the country, making it a personal thing could have implications that governing of a state should be a personal thing, that is that people should not have a monarchy and rather a republic.

7 0

3 years ago