Answer:
d. even if Ichiro was only slightly at fault.
Explanation:
If Ichiro is suing Heather for negligence, but he himself is found to have negiglent as well, his possibilities of winning the case are less even if he was only slightly at fault.
This is because the fact that he was negligent as well reduces his condition of victim, and makes him an active participant in the accident. In other words, if Ichiro is found negligent, it means that the accident and his subsequent injuries were also his fault.
Answer:
$15 million
Explanation:
The three investors' total investments would add up to 100% or 1.
The first two invested in the ration of 2:3
It means ;
Investor 1: 2/5
Investor 2: 3/5
If investor 3 invested twice as investor 1 and 2, then we can deduce that he invested ( 2/5 + 3/5) x 2
the new denominator is 10, meaning
Investor 1 had 2/10,
investor 2 had 3/10
investor 3 had 5/10
If total investments were $30 million, then the highest investor invested
5/10 x $30million
=0.5 x $30 million
=$15 million
The most logical answer is D
It could invade the privacy of the shopper when trying things on. All of the actions the customer does is being recorded, not to mention the customer has no idea who exactly is monitoring the cameras, and how many people have access to it. It could become a serious problem.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Prevention Cost is the cost which is incurred to avoid the loss due to defects in the products manufactured, here the cost incurred is as follows:
Training employees that is the benefit from training will be reducing cost and improving quality of the product, therefore, it will be considered as prevention costs.
Further cost incurred for redesigning products and processes will improve the quality of the product and the process therefore this cost can also be considered as prevention costs.
Final Answer
The above statement is true.