<span>Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? It's a civil law because it's a misunderstanding between two civilians.
</span><span>Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? I believe it might be a combination of statue and regulation law because there's some documentation and exchange item.
</span>Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is to protect the people's rights, not safety. " She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." <span>The disagreement is over a vehicle which is just property.
</span>Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? I think she does not have a valid argument. "<span> She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." </span><span>If she wants to sell her car, she should have done it the proper way, otherwise she should be prepared to meet the consequences.
</span>
Answer:
North: economically weaken the South by blockading its coast
Explanation:
The correct answer is <span>the collective action principle
This principle revolves around the idea that a group of people should work together in ensuring the well-being of everyone. If they had left it to states, numerous states probably wouldn't bother with such things because of various reasons, either financial or lack of care for people with disabilities. Because of the collective action principle, they now had to help everyone.</span>
Answer:
It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states and it required all citizens to support the slave system.
