I agree with Pavlov that Nicholas and Alexandra were not suited by personality to be rulers of a country such as Russia. In that sense, they contributed to the start of the Revolution;however, there were other factors at work, because the forces that led to the Revolution happening had been developing for years in Russia, long before the birth of Nicholas II, even. So these factors seem to have been more at work than Alexandra's personality and actions in causing the Revolution. Also, Queen Mary, King George V and the British royal family were constituentional monarchs, it must be kept in mind, which is rather different than being an autocrat like Nicholas II was, or an autocrat's consort, as Alexandra was. I think Nicholas would have made an excellant constitutional monarch, but he wasn't suited to be an autocrat. So the difference that the Romanovs, especially Nicholas and Alexandra had a lot of power, whereas the British royal family actually had very little power must be borne in mind, although it's true that Alexandra's personality and attitude was likely not suited to even being the consort of a constituentional monarch, and also Nicholas II was not a good autocrat.
A stunning 25000 people lost their lives while constructing Panama Canal and synthetic limb makers were clamoring for contracts with channel builders.
<h3>What challenges were faced by the workers of panama canal?</h3>
- To triumph over tropical disease. A disease which includes yellow fever and malaria had been unfolded via way of means of mosquitoes.
- There had been many Mosquitos due to the fact the canal direction ran via fifty-one miles of forests and swamps packed with Mosquitos.
- the Construction turned very dangerous. (Most of the canal needed to be blasted out of stable rock with explosives. Sometimes, people died whilst their shovels struck explosive charges.
- Some 6,000 lives had been misplaced whilst constructing this canal.
Thus, these were the challenges faced by the workers while constructing Panama Canal.
learn more about Panama Canal here:
brainly.com/question/1155424
#SPJ1
The correct word for it would be "<span>partisan politics", the reason why is because when they put their party agenda above everything else, they would be reluctant to change their mind according to the needs of the citizens.
Have a nice day! :)</span>
The answer is they resisted colonial rule
Answer:
The introduction of Greased cartridges in 1856 sparked the fire. The government decided to replace the old-fashioned musket, `Brown Begs` by the `Enfield rifle,. The loading process of the Enfield rifle involved bringing the cartridge to the mouth and biting of the top paper. There was a rumour among the Sepoys in January 1857 that the greased cartridge contained the fat of cow and pig, the former sacred to Hindus and latter forbidden to Muslims. The Sepoys were now convinced that the introduction of greased cartridges was a deliberate attempt to defile Hindu and Muslim religion. This sparked off the Mutiny on 29th March 1857.