1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
velikii [3]
3 years ago
8

Which statement explains why a German submarine sunk the Lusitania?

History
2 answers:
True [87]3 years ago
4 0
Among the choice provided above the statement that explains why a German submarine sunk the Lusitania is because Germany practiced unrestricted submarine warfare. This history happened last May 7, 1995, it was a <span> the 32,000-ton ship was hit by an exploding torpedo on its starboard side. </span>
Vikki [24]3 years ago
4 0

I believe the answer is: Germany practiced unrestricted submarine warfare.

In restricted werfare, all of the countries would agree that they would not attack the submarines that are not a part of the warships. (such as passenger ships). The Gerrmany choose to adopt unrestricted warfare and sunk one of England's passenger ship.

You might be interested in
How long did the watergate investigation take
timofeeve [1]
It depends on what you take to be the beginning and what the end. It lasted two years if you understand it as from the time it was revealed to the time Nixon resigned. It lasted 5 years if you take it from the time Nixon began doing it to the time he resigned.
5 0
3 years ago
What action did stalin take that heightened the tension between the united states and ussr? why did these actions concern the un
Vladimir [108]
When Stalin blockade Berlin.  Americans, English and French made air drops.  
7 0
3 years ago
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Mexican army set out for Texas?
notsponge [240]
They hoped to end the Texas revolution. <span />
6 0
3 years ago
Explain how the sharam trade helped the economy of Mali synic​
Anettt [7]
Just look it up and keep working jk beceuse is your answer
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the southern states uses the doctrine of nullification to support secession?
    12·1 answer
  • How did george washington impact the american revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • What factors made it easier for women to change in the 1920
    5·1 answer
  • Use the physical map of Europe below to answer the following question:
    6·1 answer
  • Which sentence best support the idea that Pizarro was ruthless?
    5·1 answer
  • How did European exploration affect East Asian countries?<br><br> PLEASE HELP FOR BRAINLIEST! ;)
    14·1 answer
  • Which group of people went north after the civil war ended
    5·1 answer
  • In what way did the building of the Taj Mahal contribute to the decline of the<br> Mughal Empire?
    14·1 answer
  • This city became the capital city of the Byzantine Empire by A.D. 500. New Rome Alexandria b. Constantinople d. Byzantium a. C.​
    13·2 answers
  • (Mythology) What evidence is there that the myths of a world flood may be based on a historic event?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!