Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Many people turn to drug addiction due to problems that affect their day-to-day life. They might have taken a hit in their family life, maybe lost their job or lover. Their family life could be corrupt and they may have gotten abused or harassed as a child and turn to drugs as a suppressant. Many drug users suffer from mental health disorders, such as depression. They depend on drugs or substances to numb the pain that they may be experiencing, or to distract them from the harsh reality.
Support from friends and family is crucial in the drug recovery process, many drug abusers can’t tackle the task of quitting. Sending them to a rehab clinic may seem extreme but it’s the best bet to recovery.
You can tell someone has a drug addiction pretty easily. They may have ticks or twitches, get aggressive when they’re in the withdrawal stage. They drain all their money to fuel their addiction and their physical health has burned to flames. Some drugs are so extreme, they cause you to hallucinate and actually destroy your own body; such as picking at or off their skin.
<span>Are referred to as science wars. This debate emerged in the 90s about objectivity in scientific research studies. The debate arises as a criticism of various investigations, for example of cultural anthropology or feminist studies. <span>Their originality was questioned, and above all, their objectivity because they considered that the studies were based more on social constructions than on objective facts.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
So every citizen could speak their mind and vote at a large assembly that's met to create laws.
Explanation:
Research has found that those who text message while driving are more likely to get into a crash or a near wreck than undistracted drivers
