Yes Farmer Bob still has an opportunity cost
His opportunity cost hasn’t changed it’s still 2 bushels of potatoes for every 1 bushel of carrots he grew.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": With the longer duration of unemployment benefits, firms needed to keep wages high to attract people to work. This caused downward wage rigidity, leading to persistent higher unemployment.
Explanation:
The Great Recession (2007-2009) is the period in U.S. economics when it suffered a high-scale dwindle as a result of the collapse in the real estate market and the subprime mortgage crisis. The financial sector collapsed as well forcing some banks to declare bankruptcy.
In this context, long-lasting unemployment benefits were provided such us <em>downward wage rigidity</em>, which implied employers were unable to reduce the salaries in dollar terms. By doing that, having low to none income, in order to meet their income objectives, major organizations had to lay off employees directly causing the rate of unemployment increase.
I believe it is because he made various reforms that led to
many improvements for France. A good
example of this was education. He
reformed the educational system and established schools and colleges that
enabled more people to avail of education.
He separated Church and state and did a host of other reforms that other
monarchs would not.
The answer to this question is: Conclusion
In legal terms , conclusion refers to the things that are really vital to reach a statement during a hearing.
Since the judge will make his/her decision based on the answers of the defendants, it safe to assume that every potential answer could be considered as such.
<span>I believe the correct answer is: Concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is the term used in law that refers to an opinion written by judge/judges of court which agrees with the majority, but outlines additional considerations (different reasons) he or she thinks are important.
Even though Concurring opinions can’t change the final decision, but can serve as a persuasive argument for lawyers, in many legal systems these opinions are not reported as the court "speaks with one voice".</span>