Answer:
c. Laboratory experimentation
Explanation:
Laboratory experimentation: In psychological research, the laboratory experiment is defined as an experiment that is being conducted in extremely controlled conditions in which precise measurements are being possible. Therefore, it is not necessary that laboratory experimentation is only possible in laboratories but it should be done in a controlled and artificial environment.
Strength:
1. It allows giving rise to accurate control of independent and extraneous variables.
2. It is responsible for developing cause and effect relationship.
Weaknesses:
1. Artificial environment that leads to create low realism.
2. Demand characteristics that can affect the participants to change behavior.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the laboratory experimentation.
In the survey made by United States
in the year 2009, by age 20, the percentage of youth in US that are engaged in
sexual intercourse is 77%. The percentages in the national level are as follows,
for the twelfth -graders are 49%, 40% of eleventh- graders, 29% of
tenth-graders and for the 9th graders, 21% are sexually active.
These are all according to Eaton and others, 2010.
The answer is 49, hope you got 100 on your test
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
