1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
3 years ago
15

Do you feel that it is ethical and/or appropriate to utilize a "Bottom of the Pyramid" strategy where you make money off the wor

ld's poor? Explain why you feel this way.
Business
1 answer:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Bottom of the Pyramid strategies focuses on improving widespread poverty while providing profits and growth for multinational companies at the same time. With this definition, it is an ethical business model because it the companies are profiting but at the same time those at the bottom of the pyramid are benefiting, usually from having jobs. It would be unethical if these companies were simply taking from the individuals at the bottom of the pyramid.

You might be interested in
Using FIFO for Multiproduct Inventory Transactions (Chapters 6 and 7) [LO 6-3, LO 6-4, LO 7-3] Skip to question [The following i
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

1-a. Dollars of gross profit from selling tags = $9,180

1-b. Dollars of gross profit from selling cases = $1,500

1-c. Gross profit percentage from selling tags = 72.86%

1.d. Gross profit percentage from selling cases = 83.33%

2-a. Tag yields more dollars of profit.

2-b. Tag yields more profit per dollar of sales.

Explanation:

Note: The requirements for this question are two not three as erroneously stated. This is because, the first and the third question are the same. Therefore, the two relevant requirements of the question are:

1. Calculate the dollars of gross profit and the gross profit percentage from selling tags and cases.

2. Which product line yields more dollars of profit? - Which product line yields more profit per dollar of sales?

The explanation of the answers is now given as follows:

1. Calculate the dollars of gross profit and the gross profit percentage from selling tags and cases.

Sales revenue from tags = Sales value of 160 tags mailed to customers on Jan. 8 at a price of $30 per tag + Sales value of 260 tags mailed to customers on Jan. 21 at a price of $30 per tag = (160 * $30) + (260 * $30) = $12,600

Sales revenue from cases = Sales value of 120 cases mailed to customers on Jan. 19 at a price of $15 per case = 120 * $15 = $1,800

Total number of tags sold = 160 tags mailed to customers + 260 tags mailed to customers on Jan. 21 = 420

Total number of cases sold = 120 cases mailed to customers on Jan. 19 at a price of $15 per case = 120

Using FIFO, we have:

Cost of tags sold = Value of 260 tags purchased on Jan.2 from Xioasi Manufacturing (XM) at a cost of $7 per tag + Value of the remaining 160 (i.e. 420 – 260 = 160) tags sold based on the 360 tags purchased on Jan. 11 from XM at a cost of $10 per tag = (260 * $7) + (160 * $10) = $3,420

Cost of cases sold = Value of 60 cases purchased on Jan.4 from Bachittar Products (BP) at a cost of $2 per case + Value of the remaining 60 cases sold based on the 160 cases purchased on Jan. 14 from BP at a cost of $3 per case = (60 * $2) + (60 * $3) = $300

Therefore, we have:

1-a. Dollars of gross profit from selling tags = Sales revenue from tags - Cost of tags sold = $12,600 - $3,420 = $9,180

1-b. Dollars of gross profit from selling cases = Sales revenue from cases - Cost of cases sold = $1,800 - $300 = $1,500

1-c. Gross profit percentage from selling tags = (Dollars of gross profit from selling tags / Sales revenue from tags) * 100 = ($9,180 / $12,600) * 100 = 72.86%

1.d. Gross profit percentage from selling cases = (Dollars of gross profit from selling cases / Sales revenue from cases) * 100 = 83.33%

2. Which product line yields more dollars of profit? - Which product line yields more profit per dollar of sales?

2-a. Which product line yields more dollars of profit?

From part 1 above, we have:

Dollars of gross profit from selling tags = $9,180

Dollars of gross profit from selling cases = $1,500

Since the dollars of gross profit from selling tags of $9,180 is greater than the dollars of gross profit from selling cases of $1,500, this implies that Tag yields more dollars of profit.

2-b. Which product line yields more profit per dollar of sales?

From part 1 above, we have:

Total number of tags sold = 420

Total number of cases sold = 120

Therefore, we have:

Tag's profit per dollar of sales = Dollars of gross profit from selling tags / Total number of tags sold = $9,180 / 420 = $21.86

Case's profit per dollar of sales = Dollars of gross profit from selling cases / Total number of cases sold = $1,500 / 120 = $12.50

Since Tag's profit per dollar of sales of $21.86 is greater than Case's profit per dollar of sales of $12.50, this implies that Tag yields more profit per dollar of sales.

6 0
3 years ago
Requirements
Stella [2.4K]

Journal entries:

Nov. 1, common stocks issued

Dr Cash 41,000

    Cr Common stock 41,000

Nov. 4, office supplies and furniture purchased

Dr Office supplies 1,200

Dr Furniture 2,300

    Cr Accounts payable 3,500

Nov. 6, service revenue

Dr Cash 2,100

    Cr Service revenue 2,100

Nov. 7, land purchased

Dr Land 27,000

    Cr Cash 27,000

Nov. 10, service revenue

Dr Accounts receivable 800

    Cr Service revenue 800

Nov. 14, payment of furniture

Dr Accounts payable 2,300

    Cr Cash 2,300

Nov. 15, wages expense

Dr Wages expense 1,470

    Cr Cash 1,470

Nov. 17, collection of accounts receivable

Dr Cash 500

    Cr Accounts receivable 500

Nov. 20, service revenue

Dr Accounts receivable 680

    Cr Service revenue 680

Nov. 25, received cash in advance

Dr Cash 1,900

    Cr Unearned revenue 1,900

Nov. 28, service revenue

Dr Cash 3,100

    Cr Service revenue 3,100

Nov. 29, purchase prepaid insurance

Dr Prepaid insurance 840

    Cr Cash 840

Nov. 30, wages expense

Dr Wages expense 1,470

    Cr Cash 1,470

Nov. 30, rent expense

Dr Rent expense 650

    Cr Cash 650

Nov. 30, utilities expense

Dr Utilities expense 650

    Cr Accounts payable 650

Nov. 30, dividends distributed

Dr Retained earnings 2,800

    Cr Dividends payable 2,800

Dr Dividends payable 2,800

    Cr Cash 2,800

Since there is not enough space here, I prepared an excel spreadsheet with the T-accounts.

In order to prepare a trial balance sheet, I must first prepare an Income Statement:

Service revenue              $6,680

Wages expense             ($2,940)

Rent expense                   ($650)

<u>Utilities expense              ($650)</u>

Net income:                    $2,440

Retained earnings = $2,440 (net income) - $2,800 (dividends) = ($360)

        STEWART CO.

     BALANCE SHEET

       NOV. 30, 2018

Assets:

Cash $12,070

Accounts receivable $980

Prepaid insurance $840

Office supplies $1,200

Furniture $2,300

Land $27,000

Total assets: $44,390

Liabilities and stockholders' Equity:

Accounts payable $1,850

Unearned revenue $1,900

Common stock $41,000

Retained earnings ($360)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity: $44,390

Download pdf
8 0
3 years ago
Sheffield Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution.
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

                        SHEFFIELD LABORATORY

                            PATENT (NO. 78-6002-1A)

Carrying value as at Dec 31

                                      2011                     2015                   2018

Cost                            $182,300           $349,000           $385,000

Amortization             <u> (10,724)   </u>             <u>(79,433)  </u>           <u>(142,403)</u>

                                 <u> 171,576     </u>         <u>   269,567  </u>           <u>242,597</u>

Cost

As at 31 Dec 2011

Design and construction of a prototype                                     $89,000

Testing of models                                                                           40,600

Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare application          <u> 52,700</u>

                                                                                                       <u>$182,300</u>

As at 31 Dec 2012

Cost as at Jan 1, 2012                                                                $182,300

Additional cost during the year:

Engineering activity necessary to advance.                           <u> $84,500  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$266,800</u>

As at 31 Dec 2013

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $266,800

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid                                                                              <u>$40600  </u>

                                                                                                 <u>   $307,400</u>

As at 31 Dec 2014

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $307,400

Additional cost during the year:

Research aimed at modifying the design                                <u>$41,600 </u>

                                                                                                   <u> $349,000</u>

As at 31 Dec 2018

Cost as at Jan 1, 2018                                                                $349,000

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid in unseccesful patent infrigement.                   <u>  $36,000  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$385,000</u>

Amortization for the year    

Dec 31 2011         $182,300/17 =  $10,724

Dec 31 2012

182,300/17                                          10,724

84,500/0                                          <u>      -       </u>

                                                         <u>  10,724</u>

<u />

Dec 31 , 2013 :

  $182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/0     =     <u>    -  </u>

                         <u>   16,005</u>

Dec 31 2014  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =       <u> 2,447</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Dec 31 2018  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =        2,447

36,000/0     =    <u>       -</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A company controlling a combination of factors to provide value to its target customers is the definition of a?
ale4655 [162]

When a company controls a combination of factors which it uses to provide value for its target customers, this is a marketing mix.

<h3>What is a marketing mix?</h3><h3 />

A marketing mix refers to all the factors that a company uses in order to be able to provide for the goods and services of the customers it targets.

Some of these factors include the pricing of products, the products themselves and their functions, and the place that the products are to be offered.

Find out more on marketing mix at brainly.com/question/12080147

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Growth tutorial: plato <br><br>how might the lack of this aspect of infrastructure affect health​
Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

how might the lack of this aspect of infrastructure affect health​?

Infrastructure on its own is one way of development, ways at which lack of it will affect health include;

it will deter the link between rural areas and the urban area

lack of infrastructure will help to increase the chances of breeding parasites which affects health

lack of infrastructure also affects personal hygiene as lack of water and other basic amenities affects health greatly.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A smartphone manufacturing company uses social media to achieve different business objectives. Match each social media activity
    10·2 answers
  • Why is it important to compare the APR for credit cards?
    10·2 answers
  • Malcolm sanders, a graduate student from boston, makes customized snowboards for local snowboarding enthusiasts. the demand for
    8·1 answer
  • Before ending the meeting, John Noble informed Howie that he would be sending out an e-mail to all employees asking for suggesti
    10·1 answer
  • 1960 the per capita GDP of Hong Kong was substantially less than that of Argentina and Venezuela. By 2005, the per capita income
    8·1 answer
  • One line for mother. ​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an aspect of the Project Life cycle Select one: Value to the business being assessed and product innov
    12·1 answer
  • One key to success in a career is to be an accomplished
    13·2 answers
  • Michael's Machine Shop reports the following information for the quarter.
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP MEE 50 Pts
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!