Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
at least one x-intercept - where it crosses the x axis- They both have at least one x intercept
at least one y-intercept - where it crosses the y axis- they both have at least one
an oblique asymptote or slant asymptote- when the degree of the polynomial in the numerator is higher than the denominator - this is true
a vertical asymptote - they both have a vertical asymptote
the domain - is all real values except x = -3 in one case and x=3 in the other
The expression given is ambiguous according to the standard rules of math (PEMDAS) due to the lack of appropriate parentheses and probably the exponentiation symbol ^.
From the context, I assume it to mean
(3^(1/3)) / (3^(1/3)) = 1
Since 3^(1/3) is the cube-root of 3, and is thus irrational.
However, the quotient is exactly 1, which is a rational number.
The example is therefore a counter-example for the statement that "set of irrational numbers is closed under division", or stated differently,
"<span>the set of irrational numbers is not closed under division"</span>
Answer:
8 quarters and 3 nickles
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
57
Step-by-step explanation:
I prefer the equation in this format

substitute -4 for m and 6 for n

square the 6 then multiply by 2

solve inside the absolute value then multiply by 3


divide by 4

I think the answer was 0.18 but I'm not sure so...yeah