Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
I believe it was trade and industrialization.
Answer:
Senators and Representatives come from all parts of the United States, but they do not reflect a true cross-section of America. Overall, members of Congress tend to be older, wealthier, and better educated than those they represent.
Explanation:
These differences should not be the source of systematic conflict. To find this, we must dig deeper into the structure and processes of American politics.
Answer:
Sumerians because they invented the wheel that let them travel better and they also invented cuneiform scripts that helped write several languages
