Answer:
The useful information that the configuration of the y-axis provides the reader:
The y-axis or the vertical line shows the dependent relationship that exists between its variables and the variables of the x-axis (the horizontal line). It shows the reader how much the values on the y-axis depend on the variables of the x-axis.
Explanation:
On a graph, the y-axis shows the dependent variables or values which depend on the variables of the x-axis. At the starting point or the zero coordinate, the y-axis and the x-axis are equal to zero. However, as the x-axis increases in value, the values of the y-axis are then defined on the increasing values of the variables in the x-axis. This implies that an experimenter chooses the values on the x-axis but does not determine the values that are on the y-axis. Instead, she uses the values or variables lying on the x-axis to calculate the values on the y-axis.
In the context of team and organizational effectiveness, the Dunning–Kruger effect refers to people systematically overestimating their own performance in areas where they lack competence and readily dismissing any information to the contrary.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Dunning-Kruger effects refer a situation in which people trust like they only smart and have more ability than in real scenario. However, person with less capability do not possess the more skills which required to realise their own inability.
Golem effect, a psychological effects in which less expectations are made upon individual either by superiors or by themselves, leading to poorer performance. Pygmalion effect defines the phenomenon where others' expectations for achieving the target by a person affects the aimed person's performance level.
Autler towns’ effect is related with the ohysic term for the effect and result to an oscillating electric field. From this, concluding that Option A is correct to the given statement.
Answer:
Individuals are said to be collaborating when the art of getting things done through people
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
