Explanation:
Trade was also a boon for human interaction, bringing cross-cultural contact to a whole new level. When people first settled down into larger towns in Mesopotamia and Egypt, self-sufficiency – the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything that you wanted or needed – started to fade. A farmer could now trade grain for meat, or milk for a pot, at the local market, which was seldom too far away. Cities started to work the same way, realizing that they could acquire goods they didn't have at hand from other cities far away, where the climate and natural resources produced different things. This longer-distance trade was slow and often dangerous but was lucrative for the middlemen willing to make the journey. The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan around 3000 BC, historians believe. Long-distance trade in these early times was limited almost exclusively to luxury goods like spices, textiles, and precious metals. Cities that were rich in these commodities became financially rich, too, satiating the appetites of other surrounding regions for jewelry, fancy robes, and imported delicacies. It wasn't long after that trade networks crisscrossed the entire Eurasian continent, inextricably linking cultures for the first time in history. By the second millennium BC, former backwater island Cyprus had become a major Mediterranean player by ferrying its vast copper resources to the Near East and Egypt, regions wealthy due to their own natural resources such as papyrus and wool. Phoenicia, famous for its seafaring expertise, hawked its valuable cedarwood and linens dyes all over the Mediterranean. China prospered by trading jade, spices, and later, silk. Britain shared its abundance of tin.
My hands hurt now :')
Anyways Hope this helped, Have a nice day!
answer is in attachments, Have a look.
Answer:
in an urban area Migration results in a more dense population
less job availabilities
less housing
easy transportation
I'm rural areas migration can result in
more spacious area
poor transportation
less gorvernment facilities/infrastructure
harder labour
do I need to explain more because I think these are just examples
Answer:
<em>Since there are no options, I'll answer the question according to my understanding.</em>
The concept of triadic closure suggests that if a strong tie would exist between Michelle and Brenda, as well as Michelle and J.ulie, then a strong tie would also exist between Brenda and J.ulie.
Explanation:
The "triadic closure" is a theory that was proposed by <em>Georg Simmel </em>regarding <em>"social networking.</em>" This shows the relationships among people and how their relationships evolve over time.
In the situation above, Michelle brings Brenda and J.ulie together which means Michelle is acting as the local bridge. So, this is the reason why Brenda and J.ulie stay friends. This concept is true, provided that both Brenda and J.ulie desire to be friends with each other. If not, then they are not satisfying the triadic closure property.
Answer:
The answer is D. changes that occur as a society acquires new technology.
Explanation:
According to Lenski, the term "sociocultural evolution" refers to CHANGES THAT OCCUR AS A SOCIETY ACQUIRES NEW TECHNOLOGY.
