1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
13

The drama class at a middle school was preparing for their spring play in the school auditorium. One week before the performance

, a parent complained to the school board that the play was inappropriate for middle school students. The school board agreed and contacted the principal, who then informed the classes that the show was canceled. Students were upset that their preparations were a waste. They believe they have the right to freedom of expression in performing the play. The school board said that students are minors and that it must approve decisions about what is presented in school by teachers or students. The students did not have time to plan a different show. A group of the students’ parents brought the case to court on their behalf, but they lost the case in state district court. The students’ parents appealed the district court’s decision to their state court of appeals. There the students and their parents won the case, but the school board appealed the decision to their state-level supreme court. The state supreme court ruled in favor of the school board. Unhappy with the state supreme court’s decision, the students’ parents are now appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
How is this similar to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case
Social Studies
1 answer:
Svetradugi [14.3K]3 years ago
8 0

This is similar to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case because they both represent students that are working towards the right to express themselves through writing or art. The main difference between the cases are one is fighting for the right to free written speech in Journalism, while the other is a physical piece of art.

You might be interested in
If a person attempts to make a phone call while they are waiting for a meeting to begin, they are _______. A. Combining tasks b.
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

A person attempting to make a phone call while waiting for a meeting, is starting one task before another begins. So, it's not option B since multitasking is completing two or more tasks as once. It's not option C because sequential tasking, is beginning one task and not starting another in till that initial task is completed. It's not cleaving tasks or option D because cleaving tasks just means clinging to one task. Your best answer is option A or "combining tasks", since you are completing a phone call while waiting for your meeting. It means you are completing one task while waiting for another one to start.

Hope this helps.

3 0
2 years ago
What is one group that was targeted by the women’s christian temperance union?
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

Alchol establishments

Explanation:

Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) was a religious organization founded in November 1874 in Cleveland, Ohio. The group's primary purpose was to combat the influence of alcohol on families and society. The had non-violent protests against the dangers of alcohol. The women took to the streets and held pray-ins outside local saloons, demanding that the sale of liquor be stopped. Within three months the women succeeded in driving liquor out of 250 communities.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did parliament hope to save from ruin by passing the tea act
GrogVix [38]
Hey there,
The parliament hope to save <span>the British East India Company from ruining by passing the tea act.

Hope this helps :))

~Top
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Governments that makes fast decisions are not necessarily take good decisions too.' Explain this
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

In haste decisions are poor

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Summarize the Environmental Treaty of the Kyoto Protocol. What were the results of the treaty?
irinina [24]

The Kyoto Protocol was an international treaty which extended the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits state parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus that (part one) global warming is occurring and (part two) that human-made CO2 emissions are driving it. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997 and entered into force on 16 February 2005. There were 192 parties (Canada withdrew from the protocol, effective December 2012) to the Protocol in 2020.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some features of the new state government?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following phrases BEST defines the word precinct?
    5·2 answers
  • Guys help me please I don't understand this at all and it's due tomorrow :(((((
    7·1 answer
  • What was the main outcome of the Mexican War?
    8·2 answers
  • What did Adolf hitler promise the Germans
    14·1 answer
  • Ekman conducted a number of studies of facial expressions and found that
    6·1 answer
  • Ms. young works in a school that serves a very linguistically diverse student population. she wants to write a letter home to he
    14·1 answer
  • Walter is only able to achieve sexual arousal by dressing in women’s clothing. In the American culture, his behavior would most
    7·1 answer
  • The city mayor’s corrupt policies soon attracted the attention of the local citizens.
    5·1 answer
  • All of the following are true about health insurance
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!