1) On the individuals:
Some individuals might get rich, but also sometimes arrested due to corruption.
Other individuals do not receive what they should receive, such as their pension money, if it was stolen by someone else.
2) On the society:
it hinders the development in a society, first by literally stealing tax money and then additionally due to the lack of trust in the officials
When constructing an argumentative essay, incorporate sources that are or are close to irrefutable and have relevance to what you are discussing. For example, if your topic is about why sanitary napkins for women should be free at school then present facts about how not everyone has access to them at home or how the expense would not cost a lot. However, no matter what you say it can not be opinion driven and you must have valir reasons and statistics to support your point. So using the previous topic, I would mention the actual estimated price free sanitary napkins would cost or talk about the struggles of teenage girls or teachers who cannot afford tampons. Additionally in your argumentative essay, you will need a counterclaim which is you rebuting a popular misconception or a common opposing viewpoint. For example, one may mention how female students and faculty would abuse the privilege and would not use it for only emergencies. They would then combat the statement by highlighting how many schools that do offer free sanitary napkins obtained a specific system that allows them to monitor who is borrowing what and the quantity of how much they borrow by making the pads accessible at the nurse or the administration office. You will know if something supports your claim if the evidence has the same topic and main idea as your objective and if it does not disprove your belief.
the answer to this is
C.
please mark someone brainliest, so they may rank up!
thank yo!
Answer:
They believe that the Bill of Rights are not necessary because the government should have control over these decisions.
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Explanation:
The book titled <em>"Don’t marginalize the South in America’s history</em>" by Imani Perry explores the realities and myths of the American South.
<h3>Who is Imani Perry?</h3>
This is a 49 years old Professor of African American Studies at Princeton University and the author of the book titled “South to America".
Hence, the professor wrote the book titled <em>"Don’t marginalize the South in America’s history</em>" to explores the realities and myths of the American South.
Read more about American South
<em>brainly.com/question/632932</em>
#SPJ1
