Answer:
Moshi and her best friend have agreed on the meanings of each of the symbols.
Explanation:
A symbol is a thing that is used to represent something else, particularly when a physical object is used to represent an abstract thing.
Therefore, those phrases used by Moshi and her best friend are symbols they have jointly agreed upon to use as representations specific meanings. They are effective because of their joint agreement on them. Any other phrases that they have not jointly agreed upon will have no meaning to them and they will not be effective.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) Schedule of cash receipts:
Since 100% of account receivable is collected in the month following the month of sale, which means $290,000 will be collected in July.
2) If there are no sales in September, amount of accounts receivable the company will report on its 3rd quarter balance sheet will be 0. Otherwise, the ending accounts receivable at the end of 3rd quarter will be = sales amount in September.
Answer:
A) They would be indifferent, as Sally's income net of costs equals $25,000.
Explanation:
Sally's economic profit = accounting profit - opportunity costs
- accounting profit = $12,000
- opportunity costs = $25,000 - $15,000 in lost salaries + $2,000 (lost investment revenue) = $12,000
economic profit = $12,000 - $12,000 = $0
Since the economic profit is $0, Sally should be indifferent between running her own business or working for someone else.
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.