I think it would be the third choice
Fundamental reason for this was Russia’s under-developed economy, which was mostly agricultural – in fact until the mid-1800s it was almost entirely agrarian, with only minimal manufacturing or industry. <span> Government incentives of the late 1800s instigated a sharp increase in industrial investment and manufacturing; French investors, attracted by government deals, cheap labour and tax breaks, had eagerly pumped money into Russia to construct factories and new mines. But even with this, Russia still tailed its western European neighbours by a long stretch.</span>
They were stone structures topped by huge towers, the exteriors were covered with carvings of the god worshipped inside.
try using "Socratic" for your answer
The argument Oliver Wendell Holmes was making in this quotation about how the federal system works is that:
- "The Supreme Court needs to be able to settle disputes between the states and the federal government by reviewing the constitutionality of state laws."
- This is evident when he said, "I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make the declaration as to the laws of several States."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Oliver Wendell Holmes felt for the federal system to work, the Supreme court should be able to make the distinction between federal and state laws.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17812433
