Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: Marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
Pure monopoly is a market situation in which there is a single firm who are producing the goods and these goods are the close substitute. There is no other firm in the market. So, the monopoly firm is the price setter.
The output level that is produced by the profit maximizing monopoly firm is at a point where marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost. It is the same profit maximizing condition that a competitive firm also utilize to find their equilibrium level of output.
Answer:
He must have a skratta du flörlar du in his album cover
Explanation:
You laugh, you lose
Answer:
The company can file antidumping case against the leading foreign rivals. The probability of winning the case is only high when there is cash deposits near to zero in the country and balance of payment is negative.
Explanation:
There can be a law suit files against the foreign rivals but the company will have to bear lawyers fee for this. There is a threat to employment of labor in the home country as most of the goods are imported so factories in the home country will be moved towards shut down because consumers will be buying imported goods which are offered at low price.
Answer:
Advertising a similar property can and does create interest in their property
Explanation:
In real estate agents need to effectively market properties in order to sell to consumers.
One way of doing this is by creating awareness in a given market about a particular property type.
When interest in a type of property is created it generates interest that will lead to more sales.
In the given scenario when Tom meets with his sellers to explain his advertising plan, he should make sure the owners understand that to capture a market they need to advertise even products that are similar.
As interest grows it will create a demand for that type of property
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
