Answer:
PV= $90,990.39
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future value= $140,000
Number of periods= 5 years
Rate of return= 9%
<u>To calculate the price to pay today, we need to calculate the present value. We will use the following formula:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 140,000 / (1.09^5)
PV= $90,990.39
Answer:
The survey conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today will count Bonnie as not in the labor force .
Explanation:
" not in the labor force " -
The people who are not employed and even are not unemployed are called the " not in the labor force " .
The people who are present in this category are the -
- The people taking care of children ,
- people who are not working but searching for job ,
All of them fall in this category .
Hence , according to the survey , Bonnie is under the category of " not in the labor force " .
Answer: During the year after the acquisition, the undervalued equipment will exceed Abbott's investment revenue by $1,200.
Explanation:
Multiply the amount exceeded of its carrying value by the % shares owned by Abbott.
Then divide the result by the useful life value of Barta's equipments
= (20,000 x 30%) / 5
= $1,200
Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
Answer:
A price increase of 1% will reduce quantity demanded by 4%
Explanation:
If the price elasticity is 4 then, this demand is highly responsive to changes in price.
So it will decrease by more than the price increase.
we must remember that the price-elasticity is determinate like:
↓QD / ΔP = price-elasticity
if the cofficient is 4 then a 1% increase in price:
↓QD / 0.01 = 4
↓QD = 0.04
Quantity demanded will decrease by 4%
