Answer:
Basic earning per share = $3.69
Explanation:
Earning per share (EPS) = earnings available to ordinary shareholders/ number of ordinary shares
Number of ordinary shares = 390,000 × 2 = 780,000 units
Net income 2,900,000
Preferred dividend <u> ( 24,000)</u>
Earnings available to shareholders <u>2,876,000</u>
Number of ordinary shares 780,000 units
Earnings per shares = $2,876,000/780,000 units
= $3.69
Answer:
A. A only
Explanation:
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) does not allow property, plant, and equipment to be written up or revalued. If the fair value of PP&E falls below the book value and the amount is material then a company must write down the asset to fair value.
Since under US GAAP, once PPE is written, it can not be reversed. as Company B is indicated to have reversed the write down while company A did not. It therefore means that Company A only is reporting under US GAAP.
Answer:
Reward system
Explanation:
The reward system is the mechanism that a company uses to provide a compensation to their employees that can include salary, bonuses, equity and perks to keep them happy, maintain loyalty and increase motivation. This allows the company to have a strong team that is willing to work hard in their daily activities to achieve the company's goals.
According to this, the answer is that in many larger U.S. based firms the reward system match(es) the overall strategy of the firm and reinforce(s) the culture emerging from day-to-day activities because the reward system is established in a way in which it contributes to the appropiate implementation of the strategy to achieve the goals and it also helps strengthen the way in which people perform their activities.
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Outside directors are members of the board of directors that are not employees of the corporation. While an inside director is a member of the board that is also employed by the corporation, e.g. CEO.
Corporations are separate entities form their stockholders, that is why limited liability applies to them. The board of directors doesn't have to include stockholders or employees, they usually do, but it is not required by law. Outside directors should very experienced and capable individuals that possess certain expertise that can help the corporation. Also, the board should control and supervise upper management, but if only inside directors were admitted into it, then who would control them?
